RAJENDRA AGARWAL,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding undisclosed advances and interest, as well as the disallowances for expenses with personal elements. The penalty levied under Section 271AAB was also confirmed.
What were the facts?
During a search operation, incriminating documents related to money lending and interest calculations were found at the assessee's residence. The assessee initially denied knowledge of these documents but later failed to provide satisfactory explanations for them during assessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the undisclosed advances and interest income found during search are taxable, and if disallowances for expenses with personal elements are justified. Also, whether the penalty for concealment of income is leviable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 153A,Section 132(1),Section 132(4),Section 131(1),Section 40(a)(ia),Section 271AAB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing149 Taxmann.com 399 · 2023 · SC
- Principal Commissioner Income Tax, Central-2 v. Umesh Ishrani168 citing108 Taxmann.com 437 · 2019 · HC
- Ajay Gupta v. CIT21 citing114 Taxmann.com 577 · 2020 · HC · Read judgment
- Navneet Jhamb v. ACIT4 citing156 Taxmann.com 345 · 2023 · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A-Bench” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 558 & 559/JPR/2024
In view of the above discussion and findings, we are of the considered opinion that there is no illegality or irregularity in the assessment orders relating to the two assessment years under consideration i.e. 2013-14 and 2014-15, or in the impugned orders passed by Learned CIT(A). Consequently, both the appeals and as regards the quantum assessments are hereby dismissed. ITA No.572/JP/2024 and ITA No.573/JP/2024 39. First mentioned appeal been filed, while challenging order dated 29.02.2024 passed by the Learned CIT(A), Jaipur, whereby penalty order u/s 271AAB of the Act, has been upheld.
Vide penalty order, pertaining to the aforesaid assessment year i.e. AY 2013-14, the Assessing Officer levied penalty of Rs. 35,65,000/- ( i.e. @ of 30% of the abovementioned undisclosed income of Rs. 1,18,83,333/-).
559, 572 & 573/JPR/2024 Sh. Rajendra Agarwal As noticed above, the appeal filed qua the quantum assessment stands dismissed. In view of the above findings and having regard to the provisions of section 271AAB(1)(c) of the Act, no fault can be found with the penalty order. Consequently, this appeal is hereby dismissed. ITA No. 573/JPR/2024
As noticed above, vide assessment order dated 31.03.2016 under challenge by way of the Assessing Officer made addition of Rs. 25,00,000/-, while calculating total income of the assessment year 2014-15. As regards the said amount, the Assessing Officer also passed penalty order on the same date i.e. 26.03.2019 and levied penalty of Rs. 13,95,000/-, on the total undisclosed income of Rs. 46,50,000/- as per provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 271AAB of the Act.
As noticed above, the appeal filed qua the quantum assessment stands dismissed. In view of the above findings and having regard to the provisions of section 271AAB(1)(c) of the Act, no fault can be found with the penalty order. Consequently, this appeal is also hereby dismissed.
559, 572 & 573/JPR/2024 Sh. Rajendra Agarwal 42. Copy of the common judgment be also placed in the connected appeal files, for record. 43. Appeal files be consigned to the record room, after the needful is done by the office.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026