M/S. Pluralsight Llc, United States of America vs. DCIT Asmt, Circle-2(1), Bengaluru
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 37/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Aug 2023AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Pluralsight Llc, Dcit, 182N Union Avenue, Farmington, Asmt, Utah, Foreign, Vs. Circle – 2(1), United States. Bengaluru. Pan : Aahcp 5337 K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Dhanesh Bafna, Ca Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit(Dr), Itat, Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 16.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.08.2023
For Appellant: Shri. Dhanesh Bafna, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT(DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 143Section 143(2)Section 250Section 9(1)(vi)
…thodology employed in Page 14 of 17 evolving databases with the users, nor imparts any information relating to them.” (emphasis supplied) 18. On similar facts as that of the assessee, the Hon’ble AAR in the case of Factset Research Systems Inc., reported in 317 ITR 169 (AAR) had held as under in Para 11 of the ruling: “11. The learned Departmental Representative then invoked clause (iv) of Explanation 2 which speaks of "imparting any information concerning technical, industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge, experience or skill". The DTAA (Article 12.3) uses slightly different language. It speaks of paym…