ACIT v. Prabhat Oil Mills

52 TTJ 533Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1995#2403 most cited

What is ACIT v. Prabhat Oil Mills authority for?

Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, dealing with unexplained money, can only be invoked if the money is physically found in the possession of the assessee.

48

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

ACIT v. Prabhat Oil Mills · Prabhat Oil Mills · Section 69A · unexplained money · physical possession of money · invocation of Section 69A · money not physically found · ITAT 1995 · Income Tax Act Section 69A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ACIT v. Prabhat Oil Mills

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA vs. PATNA IRON PVT. LTD., PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 373/PAT/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna26 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vp & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am Asst. Commissioner Of Income Patna Iron Pvt. Ltd. Tax, Central Circle-2 Ground Floor, Suprabhat 6Th Floor, Annexe, Central Building, Ceat Compound, Vs. Building, Beer Chand Patel Path, Phulwari, Patna-800001, Bihar Patna, Bihar-800001, (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aafcp2484B Asst. Commissioner Of Income Patna Iron Pvt. Ltd. Tax, Central Circle-2 Ground Floor, Suprabhat 6Th Floor, Annexe, Central Building, Ceat Compound, Vs. Building, Beer Chand Patel Path, Phulwari, Patna-800001, Bihar Patna, Bihar-800001, (Respondent) (Appellant) Sushil Kumar Kanodia N-601, Profesor Colony, Acit, Central Circle-2 Chitragupta Nagar, Kanakrbagh, Vs. Patna, Bihar Patna-800020, Bihar (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Agypk0702D Assessee By : Shri Manish Rastogi, Ar Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.02.2025

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Md. A.H. Chowdhary, DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153C

…ird party or statement of a third party could not be treated as so sacrosanct so as to read as a positive material against the assessee. Therefore, addition in the hands of the assessee on account of 'on-money was not justified" iv) ACIT v. Prabhat Oil Mills [52 TTJ 533 (Ahd)] In this case, the department relied upon certain notings in the seized diary found from the premises of third party and contended that the assessee had made sales outside the books of accounts. However, the assessee denied of having made any sales outside the books of accounts. The Hon'ble Tribunal held that once the assessee denies the tra…

SUSHIL KUMAR KANODIA,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 237/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna26 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vp & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am Asst. Commissioner Of Income Patna Iron Pvt. Ltd. Tax, Central Circle-2 Ground Floor, Suprabhat 6Th Floor, Annexe, Central Building, Ceat Compound, Vs. Building, Beer Chand Patel Path, Phulwari, Patna-800001, Bihar Patna, Bihar-800001, (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aafcp2484B Asst. Commissioner Of Income Patna Iron Pvt. Ltd. Tax, Central Circle-2 Ground Floor, Suprabhat 6Th Floor, Annexe, Central Building, Ceat Compound, Vs. Building, Beer Chand Patel Path, Phulwari, Patna-800001, Bihar Patna, Bihar-800001, (Respondent) (Appellant) Sushil Kumar Kanodia N-601, Profesor Colony, Acit, Central Circle-2 Chitragupta Nagar, Kanakrbagh, Vs. Patna, Bihar Patna-800020, Bihar (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Agypk0702D Assessee By : Shri Manish Rastogi, Ar Revenue By : Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.02.2025

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Md. A.H. Chowdhary, DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153C

…ird party or statement of a third party could not be treated as so sacrosanct so as to read as a positive material against the assessee. Therefore, addition in the hands of the assessee on account of 'on-money was not justified" iv) ACIT v. Prabhat Oil Mills [52 TTJ 533 (Ahd)] In this case, the department relied upon certain notings in the seized diary found from the premises of third party and contended that the assessee had made sales outside the books of accounts. However, the assessee denied of having made any sales outside the books of accounts. The Hon'ble Tribunal held that once the assessee denies the tra…

BIREN MANNA,MUMBAI vs. ITO -WARD-23(1)(6), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6373/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant ()\Nand\Nshri Rahul Chaudhary ()\N\Nita No. 6373/Mum/2025\N Assessment Year: 2022-23\N\Nshri Biren Manna,\N5/7, Vithoba Lane, 4Th Floor,\Nroom No. 40, Vithalwadi,\Nkalbadevi,\Nmumbai-400 002.\Npan No. Aadpm 0809 N\Nappellant\Nassessee By\Nrevenue By\Nvs.\Nito Ward 23 Ward 23(1)(6),\Npirmal Chamber,\Nmumbai-400012.\Nrespondent\Nmr. Paras B. Jain\Nmr. Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, Sr. Dr\Ndate Of Hearing\Ndate Of Pronouncement\N:\N:\N01/12/2025\N22/12/2025\N\Norder\Nper Om Prakash Kant, Am\N\Nthis Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against Order Dated\N03.09.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax\N(Appeals) – National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [In Short ‘The Ld.\Ncit(A)'] For Assessment Year 2022-23, Raising Following Grounds:\N\N1. Void Order\N1.

Section 115BSection 132Section 143(3)Section 69Section 69B

…(72 taxmann.com\n355)(Guj);\n(d) Naren Premchand Nagda vs. ITO (ITA No.3265 (Mum) of 2015.);\n(e) CIT vs. Sant Lal (2020) (118 taxmann.com 432)(Delhi);\n(f) Jawaharbhai Atmaram Hathiwala vs. ITO (2010)(128 TTJ\n36)(Ahd);\n(g) ACIT vs. Prabhat Oil Mills (1995)(52 TTJ 533) (Ahd Trib);\n(h) ACIT vs. Anand Kumar Jain (2023) (147 taxmann.com 124)(Mит\nTrib);\n(i) Pramod Pandey vs. ACIT (ITA No.4295 (Delhi) of 2012); (i)\n(j) Atul Tantia vs.DCIT (ITA No.492/Kol/2021 dated 28-03-2023);\n12.3 From the facts discussed above, we notice that the Ld CIT(A)\nhas deleted this addition of Rs.80.00 lakhs for justifiable reasons.…

DCIT, CC-6(1), MUMBAI, BKC, MUMBAI vs. RAJARAMPURI MOTIPURI GOSAVI, THANE

In the result, all the grounds of appeal and consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3858/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankardeputy Commissioner Of V/S. Rajarampuri Motipuri Income Tax, Central Circle – बनाम Gosavi 6(1) 1002 Steppes Vasant Lawns, Room No. 445, 4Th Floor, Pokharan Road No. 2, Kautilya Bhavan, Bandra Eastern Express Highway, Kurla Complex, Bandra Subhash Nagar, Thane – 400 (East), Mumbai – 400 051, 601, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Abjpg2425M Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Mr. Subodh Ratnaparkhi,ARFor Respondent: Shri Annavaran Kosuri, (Sr. AR)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Deputy Commissioner of v/s. Rajarampuri Motipuri Income Tax, Central Circle – बनाम Gosavi 6(1) 1002 Steppes Vasant Lawns, Room No. 445, 4th Floor, Pokharan Road No. 2, Kautilya Bhavan, Bandra Eastern Express Highway, Kurla Complex, Bandra Subhash Nagar, Thane – 400 (East), Mumbai – 400 051, 601, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: ABJPG2425M Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Assessee by : Mr. Subodh Ratnaparkhi,AR Revenue by : Shri Ann…

ACIT CC-6(1), MUMBAI, BKC, MUMBAI vs. VINAYKUMAR SUDHAKAR DESHPANDE, SOLAPUR, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, the ground of appeal and consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6278/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankarassistant Commissioner Of V/S. Vinaykumar Sudhakar Income Tax, Central Circle- 6(1) बनाम Deshpande Room No. 445, 4Th Floor, 528, Deshpande Lane, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra Near Bank Sangola, (East), Mumbai – 400 051, Solapur – 413 307, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Abcpd0198H Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Satyaprakash Singh,ARFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr. DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL”F” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assistant Commissioner of v/s. Vinaykumar Sudhakar Income Tax, Central Circle- 6(1) बनाम Deshpande Room No. 445, 4th Floor, 528, Deshpande Lane, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra Near Bank Sangola, (East), Mumbai – 400 051, Solapur – 413 307, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: ABCPD0198H Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Assessee by : Shri Satyaprakash Singh,AR Revenue by : Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr. DR) Date of Hearing 22.08.…

Showing 120 of 48 · Page 1 of 3