ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA vs. PATNA IRON PVT. LTD., PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that additions based on documents seized from a third party can only be made if proceedings are initiated under Section 153C. Since proceedings were initiated under Section 153A, the assessment was deemed invalid.
What were the facts?
During a search operation, incriminating documents were found from a third party. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions based on these documents, initiating proceedings under Section 153A. The assessee argued that proceedings should have been under Section 153C as the documents were seized from someone else.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made based on documents seized from a third party are valid when assessment proceedings were initiated under Section 153A instead of Section 153C.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT1,372 citing187 ITR 688 · 1991 · SC
- CIT v. Sant Lal154 citing317 CTR 483 · 2020 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja147 citing302 ITR 63 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- Shyam Sunder Khandelwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax97 citing161 Taxmann.com 255 · 2024 · HC
- PCIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd.71 citing396 ITR 677 · 2017 · HC
- ACIT v. Prabhat Oil Mills48 citing52 TTJ 533 · 1995 · ITAT
- Jawaharbhai Atmaram Hathiwala v. ITO45 citing128 TTJ 36 · 2010 · ITAT
- ACIT v. Pramod Jain7 citing176 Taxmann.com 762 · 2025 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, PATNA
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VP & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM Shri Manish Rastogi, AR
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
These appeals of two different assessee’sappeal by the Revenue are against the order of the Comm
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026