ACIT, Central Circle, Alwar vs. Sh. Tara Chand Gupta, Alwar
In the result the appeal filed by the revenue in ITA no
ITA 514/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA. Nos.447 to 449/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2015-16 to 2017-18 Shri Tarachand Gupta 9 Keshav Nagar Sch 13, Alwar बनाम ACIT, Vs. Central Circle, Alwar स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AAYPC 5777 E अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ITA. No. 514/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 ACIT, Central Circle, Alwar बनाम Shri Tarachand Gupta 9 Kesh
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR a
Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69C
…ods, which were sold, had been made by the assessee and that investment was also not disclosed, only the excess over the cost incurred could be treated as profit. Accordingly, only profits embedded in sale proceeds can be taxed. Abhishek Corporation Vs. DCIT 63 TTJ 651 (Ahd.) (Trib.) Seized documents indicating that assessee was receiving premium/‘on money’ on booking of flats belonging to other parties. AO justified in rejecting the books of accounts. However, entire premium charged by assessee cannot be treated as undisclosed income for block period because AO had not proved by bringing material on record that…