766/767) Mehboob Productions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT, XIX QB 647 Yarmouth v. France at 652 and 658

166 ITR 66Supreme Court of India1987#13604 most cited
7

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2009 to 2019.

Judgments citing 766/767) Mehboob Productions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT, XIX QB 647 Yarmouth v. France at 652 and 658

DCIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BENGAL BEVERAGES PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue, is dismissed

ITA 1218/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Oct 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.1218/Kol/2015 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Cir – 11(1), Kolkata Vs. M/S. Bengal Beverages Pvt. Ltd. P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata – 700 069 6, Alipore Park Road, Alipore, Kolkata – 700 027 "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aabcb5984E (Revenue/Department) .. (Assessee) Assessee By : Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue/Department By : Shri R. P. Nag, Acit (Dr) सुनवाईक"तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 10/08/2017 घोषणाक"तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement: 06/10/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Revenue, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2010-11, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-4, Kolkata, In Appeal No. 502/Cit(A)-4/Circle-11/Kol/14- 15, Dated 06.07.2015, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961, (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’), Dated 08.03.2013. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeals: “That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, Ld Cit(A) Has Erred In Deleting Disallowance Of Additional Depreciation Of Rs.90,56,200/- U/S 32(1) (Iia) Of The I.T.Act,1961, Relating To Visicooler Machine.”

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. P. Nag, ACIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)

…ority it stands established that 'visicooler' in the assessee's case is a 'plant', which accelerates its trading activities & manufacturing process. The assessee also relied on the following judgments: ln CIT vs. Elecon Engineering Co, Ltd. reported in [1987] 166 ITR 66 (SC) it was held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of lndia that "the word 'plant' in its ordinary meaning is a word import and it must be broadly construed having regard to the fact that articles such as books and surgical instruments were expressly covered within the definition of plant under Section 43(3) of the Act." M/s. Bengal Beverages Pvt. Ltd…

BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal is partly allowed

ITA 3688/DEL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Oct 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri Inturi Rama Rao Assessment Year : 2005-06 Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Vs. Assistant Cit, Bses Bhawan, Nehru Place, Circle-3(1), New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2005-06 Deputy Cit, Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Circle 3(1), Bses Bhavan, Nehru Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year : 2006-07 Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Vs. Assistant Cit, Bses Bhawan, Nehru Place, Circle-3(1), New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2006-07 Deputy Cit, Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Circle 3(1), Bses Bhavan, Nehru Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 154

…gard, is invited to the following decisions wherein the Courts have held that cables connected to the machine would form integral part of the machine and would accordingly, be eligible for depreciation as part of the machine: - CIT vs. Elecon Engg. Co. Ltd. : 166 ITR 66 (SC) - CIT vs. Birla Jute & Industries Ltd.: 260 ITR 55 (Cal) - CIT vs. Oswal Woollen Mill Ltd.: 289 ITR 261 (P&H) - CIT vs. Metalman Auto (P.) Ltd: 336 ITR 434 (P&H) - CIT v. India Turpentine & Rosin Co. Ltd.: 75 ITR 533 (All.) - DCIT vs. UAL Industries: 31 taxmann.com 111 (Kolkata - Trib.) (TM) - Ghaziabad footwear (P.) Ltd vs. DCIT: 142 Taxman…

766/767) Mehboob Productions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT, XIX QB 647 Yarmouth v. France at 652 and 658 (166 ITR 66) — Cited in 7 Judgments | BharatTax