(3) CIT v. Khusha J Chand Nirmal Kumar

263 ITR 77High Court2003#10434 most cited

What is (3) CIT v. Khusha J Chand Nirmal Kumar authority for?

No additions can be made solely on the basis of third-party statements or departmental valuation reports without corroborating independent evidence and without affording an opportunity for cross-examination. Additions cannot be made in income merely on the basis of a report obtained from a Departmental Valuation Officer if no evidence was found during the search.

10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Khusha J Chand Nirmal Kumar · 263 ITR 77 · third party statement · corroboration · independent evidence · natural justice · cross examination · departmental valuation officer · section 158BC · block assessment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing (3) CIT v. Khusha J Chand Nirmal Kumar

(3) CIT v. Khusha J Chand Nirmal Kumar (263 ITR 77) — Cited in 10 Judgments | BharatTax