2010) 327 ITR 121 (Bombay); VII. Ananda Social & Educational Trust v. CIT

411 ITR 235Supreme Court of India2019#14230 most cited
7

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 2010) 327 ITR 121 (Bombay); VII. Ananda Social & Educational Trust v. CIT

ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST REGD, MOHALI,MOHALI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal is allowed

ITA 1136/CHANDI/2024[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1136/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2025-26 Aryans Educational & The Cit (Exemptions), Charitable Trust, Regd.Mohali Vs Chandigarh, C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate, # 527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Manav Bansal, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 07.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Tej Mohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(1)(ii)Section 13(3)

…idence filed by the Assessee during the appellate proceedings before the ld. CIT(A) is not justified on the part of the ld. CIT(A). In fact, the case laws relied upon by the ld. CIT(A) on the decision of ‘CIT (E) vs. Jagannath Gupta Family Trust’, reported in 411 ITR 235 is also not appropriate. It is because in Jagannath Gupta Family Trust’s case (supra), the matter was relating to the money laundering in lieu of cash, such is not the factual position in this case. Further, even the statements of students recorded by the Assessing Officer for payment of donation to the institutions were not produced for cross ex…

2010) 327 ITR 121 (Bombay); VII. Ananda Social & Educational Trust v. CIT (411 ITR 235) — Cited in 7 Judgments | BharatTax