ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST REGD, MOHALI,MOHALI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

Similar judgments

Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.

• The Fine Arts Society, Mumbai vs ITO (E) 2(4), Mumbai
  Mumbai4 Jul 2018Allowed

  Also relies on Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 33 of 176 4.17 In Yogiraj Charity Trust v. CIT and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal held that the assessee was engaged in educational activities and the main object was not renting the hall. The proviso to Section 2(15) applies only to 'advancement of any other object of general public util...

• Ashwini Sahakari Rungnalaya & Research… vs Commissioner of Income-Tax, (Exemptions)…
  Pune7 Mar 2024Dismissed

  Also relies on Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 33 of 176 4.17 In Yogiraj Charity Trust v. CIT and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal held that the assessee was engaged in providing medical services on commercial principles, not for charitable purposes. The operation of a medical shop within the hospital, selling items at MRP with a small ...

• M/S U.P Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…
  Lucknow10 Jun 2022Partly Allowed

  Also relies on Assessing Officer. 75. In Sanjeevamma Hanumanthe Gowda Charitable Trust v. Director of Income Tax (Exemption) and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal held that the assessee's activities were charitable in nature and that the denial of exemption under Section 11 was incorrect. It also found that certain amounts transferred to the IDRF account were not taxa...

• Astt. Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S U.P Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow
  Lucknow8 Jun 2022Dismissed

  Also relies on Assessing Officer. 75. In Sanjeevamma Hanumanthe Gowda Charitable Trust v. Director of Income Tax (Exemption) and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal held that the assessee's activities were for general public utility and not hit by the proviso to Section 2(15). It also found that benefits provided to employees did not violate Section 13(3) as they were n...

• Devki Devi Foundation, New Delhi vs DIT (Exemptions), New Delhi
  Delhi22 Oct 2019Allowed

  Also relies on Victoria Technical Institute v. ACIT and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal held that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence of free treatment to EWS patients and that the payments to group concerns did not necessarily indicate a lack of charitable intent. Therefore, the with...