Section 271H of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 271H is Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI (73 Taxmann.com 252), cited in 1,778 of the 27 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 271H

Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI
73 Taxmann.com 252 · 2016 · High Court
1,778
citing judgments

The amendment to Section 200A, enabling the levy of late filing fees under Section 234E, applies prospectively from June 1, 2015. Therefore, no fee under Section 234E can be levied via an intimation issued under Section 200A for periods prior to this date.

Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan v. Union of India
63 Taxmann.com 243 · 2015 · High Court
397
citing judgments

The imposition of fees for late filing of TDS/TCS returns prior to the Finance Act, 2015 amendments was not illegal, and the Rajasthan High Court found no justification to interfere with such compensatory fees.

Sree Narayana Guru Smaraka Sangam Upper Primary School v. Union of India and Others
392 ITR 457 · 2017 · High Court
217
citing judgments
137 (Guj.) IV. Qatalys Software Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. UOI
115 Taxmann.com 345 · 2020 · High Court
178
citing judgments

Intimations issued under Section 200A cannot levy fee under Section 234E for belated filing of TDS statements that relate to periods prior to June 1, 2015, as the amendment to Section 200A allowing such levy is prospective from June 1, 2015.

Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ld v. DCIT
23 Taxmann.com 265 · 2012 · High Court
147
citing judgments

The rule of consistency does not override the correct application of law and should not be applied if it leads to an anomalous outcome.

United Metals v. ITO
137 Taxmann.com 115 · 2022 · High Court
127
citing judgments

The amendment to Section 200A(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, allowing for the levy of fees under Section 234E, is prospective in nature and applies only from June 1, 2015. Consequently, no fee under Section 234E can be levied for delayed filing of TDS/TCS statements pertaining to quarters prior to this date.

Rohitasava Chand v. CIT
306 ITR 242 · 2008 · High Court
59
citing judgments

Receipt of a non-compete fee, even if it does not alter the assessee's business structure, impairs the carrying on of their activity, constituting a loss of a source of income.

Dr. Amrit Lai Mangal v. Union of India
62 Taxmann.com 310 · 2015 · High Court
58
citing judgments

Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which levies a fee for delayed filing of TDS statements, is intra vires the Constitution. However, this fee cannot be levied for statements filed prior to June 1, 2015.

Agra) (iv) K K Khullar v. DCIT
44 ITR 529 · 1962 · Supreme Court
47
citing judgments

Each income tax assessment year is a self-contained period, and the rule of res judicata does not apply, meaning decisions from one assessment year are not binding on subsequent assessment years.

Chandigarh (iii) Meeraj Estate & Developers v. DCIT
116 ITD 301 · 2009 · ITAT
46
citing judgments

The amount collected in advance for a specific purpose is not considered income under sections 4 and 5 of the Income-tax Act, unless the assessee performs the function for which the amount was collected and the associated liability is discharged. Consequently, the entire amount with an attached liability cannot be taxed as income.

Judgments on Section 271H

Showing 120 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

Section 271H of the Income Tax Act — Case Laws | BharatTax