Section 200A(1) of the Income Tax Act
The decision most relied on for Section 200A(1) is Ambica Quarry Works v. State of Gujarat (4 SCC 363), cited in 117 of the 42 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.
Leading authorities on Section 200A(1)
Ambica Quarry Works v. State of Gujarat
4 SCC 363 · 1992 · Supreme Court
117
citing judgments
Condonation of delay is an exception to the rules of limitation, which aim for prompt action and do not intend to destroy rights. A liberal or justice-oriented approach cannot justify condoning unexplained or unjustifiable delay, nor should it be seen as an anticipated benefit, especially for government departments.
29. In Oriental Aroma Chemical Industries Limited v. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation
5 SCC 459 · 2010 · Reported
21
citing judgments
Bhag Mal (Alias) Ram Bux & Ors. v. Munshi (Dead) by LRs & Ors.
11 SCC 285 · 2007 · Supreme Court
11
citing judgments
True Blue Voice India (P.) Ltd. v. CCIT(TDS)
472 ITR 480 · High Court
6
citing judgments
Judgments on Section 200A(1)
Showing 1–20 of 42 · Page 1 of 3