Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.284

Section 151(ii) falls under section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 284 (Sanction for issue of notice) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 284 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 151(ii) is Ramesh Bachulal Mehta v. ITO (177 Taxmann.com 606), cited in 27 of the 123 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 151(ii)

Ramesh Bachulal Mehta v. ITO
177 Taxmann.com 606 · 2025 · High Court
27
citing judgments

Sanction for issuing a reassessment notice under Section 148 is a prerequisite for the Assessing Officer to assume jurisdiction. The specified authority under Section 151(i) could grant sanction only until the expiry of the prescribed period, considering any extensions provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA).

Alag Property Construction (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
179 Taxmann.com 578 · 2025 · High Court
21
citing judgments

Sanction for reassessment proceedings under Section 151(i) must be obtained from the specified authority within the extended timeline provided by Section 3(1) of TOLA, especially when the three-year period for initiating reassessment expires during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Failure to obtain sanction from the correct authority renders the reassessment proceedings invalid.

ACIT v. Surya Ferrous Alloys (P.) Ltd.
169 Taxmann.com 736 · 2024 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

Reassessment orders are liable to be quashed if the approval for issuing notice under section 148 was not obtained from the specified authority under section 151(ii).

Micro Marbles Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO
457 ITR 569 · 2023 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings are vitiated if the Assessing Officer fails to provide the assessee with the relevant documents and material forming the basis for initiating such proceedings. This failure, including not supplying statements relied upon, can lead to the quashing of the notice and subsequent assessment order.

Pradeep Himatlal Shah v. ITO
170 Taxmann.com 471 · 2025 · High Court
10
citing judgments

A notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, issued beyond three years from the relevant assessment year, requires the sanction of the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner, and not merely the Principal Commissioner, for validity.

736 (Mumbai Trib.); (iv) Rahat Mohammed Riyazuddin Shaikh v. ITO and ACIT vs. Ramchand Thakurdas Jhamtani
173 Taxmann.com 182 · 2025 · Reported
6
citing judgments
Rajeev Bansal Judgment (SC) In Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal
167 Taxmann 70 · 2024 · Supreme Court
3
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 151(ii)

Tapan Jena, Balasore vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Balasore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 566/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Gopalan Gurusamyआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.566/Ctk/2026 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Tapan Jena Vs Ito, Ward-1, Balasore At/P.O-Santia, Ps- Jaleswar, Dist- Balasore - 756032, Odisha Pan No. : Aeqpj4037G (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्धाररतीकीओरसे /Assessee By : Shri P. K. Mishra, Ar रधजस्वकीओरसे /Revenue By : Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. D.R. सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 30/09/2026 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30/09/2026 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] In Appeal No.Nfac/2016-17/10255396 Dated 27.08.2025 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Shri P. K. Mishra, Ar Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee & Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. D.R. Represented On Behalf Of The Revenue. 3. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That The Impugned Assessment Year Is 2017-18. The Assessee Had Filed Its Return On 26.10.2017 Disclosing An Income Of Rs.98,51,560/-. It Was The Submission That The Assessment Was Reopened By Issuing Of Notice U/S 148 On 2 29.07.2022. The Ld. Ar Drew Our Attention To The Notice U/S 148 Which Reads As Follows:

For Appellant: Shri P. K. Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 148Section 151

Tapan Jena, Balasore vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Balasore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 566/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Gopalan Gurusamyआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.566/Ctk/2026 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Tapan Jena Vs Ito, Ward-1, Balasore At/P.O-Santia, Ps- Jaleswar, Dist- Balasore - 756032, Odisha Pan No. : Aeqpj4037G (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्धाररतीकीओरसे /Assessee By : Shri P. K. Mishra, Ar रधजस्वकीओरसे /Revenue By : Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. D.R. सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 30/09/2026 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30/09/2026 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] In Appeal No.Nfac/2016-17/10255396 Dated 27.08.2025 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Shri P. K. Mishra, Ar Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee & Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. D.R. Represented On Behalf Of The Revenue. 3. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That The Impugned Assessment Year Is 2017-18. The Assessee Had Filed Its Return On 26.10.2017 Disclosing An Income Of Rs.98,51,560/-. It Was The Submission That The Assessment Was Reopened By Issuing Of Notice U/S 148 On 2 29.07.2022. The Ld. Ar Drew Our Attention To The Notice U/S 148 Which Reads As Follows:

For Appellant: Shri P. K. Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 148Section 151

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Madurai vs. Neelamegam Alagarsamy, Madurai

In the result, the Cross Objections filed by the assessee for the AY(s)

ITA 567/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Aug 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.1245 To 1247/Chny/2026 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2015-16, 2018-19 & 2021-22) Neelamegam Alagarsamy, The Deputy Commissioner Of 19, Karuppana Pillai Lane, Vs. Income Tax, New Mahalipatti Road, Central Circle-2 Madurai – 625 001. Madurai. [Pan:Afbpa-6209-H] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) आयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.523, 564 To 567 & 1367 To 1370/Chny/2026 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years:2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23 & 2023-24) The Assistant Commissioner Of Neelamegam Alagarsamy, Income Tax, Vs. 19, Karuppana Pillai Lane, Central Circle-2 New Mahalipatti Road, Madurai. Madurai – 625 001. (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) [Pan:Afbpa-6209-H] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) C.O.No.26/Chny/2026 (In Ita No.565/Chny/2026) & C.O.No.27/Chny/2026 (In Ita No.564/Chny/2026) (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2017-18 & 2016-17) Neelamegam Alagarsamy, The Assistant Commissioner Of 19, Karuppana Pillai Lane, Vs. Income Tax, New Mahalipatti Road, Central Circle-2 Madurai – 625 001. Madurai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) [Pan:Afbpa-6209-H] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant)

For Appellant: Shri. R. Venkata Raman, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Madurai vs. Neelamegam Alagarsamy, Madurai

In the result, the Cross Objections filed by the assessee for the AY(s)

ITA 566/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Aug 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.1245 To 1247/Chny/2026 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2015-16, 2018-19 & 2021-22) Neelamegam Alagarsamy, The Deputy Commissioner Of 19, Karuppana Pillai Lane, Vs. Income Tax, New Mahalipatti Road, Central Circle-2 Madurai – 625 001. Madurai. [Pan:Afbpa-6209-H] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) आयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.523, 564 To 567 & 1367 To 1370/Chny/2026 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years:2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23 & 2023-24) The Assistant Commissioner Of Neelamegam Alagarsamy, Income Tax, Vs. 19, Karuppana Pillai Lane, Central Circle-2 New Mahalipatti Road, Madurai. Madurai – 625 001. (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) [Pan:Afbpa-6209-H] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) C.O.No.26/Chny/2026 (In Ita No.565/Chny/2026) & C.O.No.27/Chny/2026 (In Ita No.564/Chny/2026) (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2017-18 & 2016-17) Neelamegam Alagarsamy, The Assistant Commissioner Of 19, Karuppana Pillai Lane, Vs. Income Tax, New Mahalipatti Road, Central Circle-2 Madurai – 625 001. Madurai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) [Pan:Afbpa-6209-H] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant)

For Appellant: Shri. R. Venkata Raman, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132