HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GURGAON

In the result, all three appeals of the assessee are allowed, and the\nstay application is dismissed as being infructuous

147 taxmann.com\n224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for\nfinal adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court\njudgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave\nneither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once\nleave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality.\n6\nITA Nos.827/D/21 With

CLAAS AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 4(2), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

147\ntaxmann.com 224 (SC) (Annexure-C). The grant of leave\nsignifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and\nthe correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands\nsquarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave does not\naffirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once\nleave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality

MUFG BANK LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2(2)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, all five appeals of the assessee are allowed

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality.\n11. It is respectfully

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL & CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-25(1), DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwalteva Pharmaceutical & Chemical Vs Assessment Unit, Income Industries India Private Limited, Tax Department/Deputy 8Th Floor, C-Wing Time Square, Commissioner Of Income Andherikurla Road, Marol Naka, Tax, Circle 25(1), Opp Mittal Industrial Estate C. R. Building, Delhi- Andheri (E), Mumbai 400059, 110001 Maharashtra, India Pan: Bnspk7225H Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Sachit Jolly, Sr. Adv, Sh. Sohamdua, Adv& Sh. Abhiudaya Shankar Bajpai, Adv Revenue By Sh. S. K. Jadhav, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 19/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 19/01/2026 Order Per Yogesh Kumar, U.S. Jm: The Captioned Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Challenging The Final Assessment Order Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) R.W.

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC) (Annexure-C). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave does not affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality

BOEING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (DCIT) , CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, all ITA Nos

147 taxmann.com 224\n(SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final\nadjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment\nstands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm\nthe High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the\nHigh Court judgment loses finality

BENETTON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , CIRCLE 4(2), NEW DELHI, CR BUILDING

In the result, all ITA Nos

147 taxmann.com 224\n(SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final\nadjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment\nstands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm\nthe High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the\nHigh Court judgment loses finality

CUBE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION ASSETS ADVISORS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(1) DELHI, C.R. BUILDING, DELHI, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result,all appeals as per ITA Nos

147 taxmann.com 224\n(SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final\nadjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment\nstands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm\nthe High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the\nHigh Court judgment loses finality

LINTEC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,SOUTH DELHI, DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 13(1), OFFICE OF DCIT, CR BUILDING, DELHI,

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwallintec India Private Limited Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of 14Th Floor, Eros Corporate Tower, Income Tax, Circle 13(1), Nehru Place, South Delhi, Delhi Office Of The Dcit, C. R. 110019, Building, Delhi Pan: Aaccl23772F Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Supriya Mehta, Ca Revenue By Sh. S. K. Jadhav, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 19/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21/01/2026

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC) (Annexure-C). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave does not affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality

AMPLIFON (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 7, DELHI

In the result, all ITA Nos

147 taxmann.com 224\n(SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final\nadjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment\nstands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm\nthe High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the\nHigh Court judgment loses finality

HONDA INDIA POWER PRODUCTS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-10(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all two appeals are allowed

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.2139 & 2140/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 बनाम Honda India Power Products Ltd. Acit, 409, Dlf Tower B, Vs. Circle-10(1), C.R. Building, Jasola Commercial Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaach8464L अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully

HONDA INDIA POWER PRODUCTS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-10(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all two appeals are allowed

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.2139 & 2140/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 बनाम Honda India Power Products Ltd. Acit, 409, Dlf Tower B, Vs. Circle-10(1), C.R. Building, Jasola Commercial Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaach8464L अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully

HASKONINGDHV CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-10(1) , DELHI

In the result, ITA No.1040/Del/2021 (Honda Cars India Ltd

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6120/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Haskoningdhv Consulting Private Limited Acit, Office No.204, 2Nd Floor, Rs Tower, Plot No. B Vs. Circle-10(1), 358A, New Ashok Nagar No.1267, Room No.389 A, 3Rd Floor, C.R. Building, Vasundhara Enclave, East Delhi. Pan No.Aaacm8966G Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully