THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

House Property – Suo motu disallowed by assessee Additional disallowance 31,38,876 Considered by AO as pertaining to House 85,29,558 38.16% of the total

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

House Property – Suo motu disallowed by assessee Additional disallowance 31,38,876 Considered by AO as pertaining to House 85,29,558 38.16% of the total

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

House Property – Suo motu disallowed by assessee Additional disallowance 31,38,876 Considered by AO as pertaining to House 85,29,558 38.16% of the total

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

House Property – Suo motu disallowed by assessee Additional disallowance 31,38,876 Considered by AO as pertaining to House 85,29,558 38.16% of the total

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

House Property – Suo motu disallowed by assessee Additional disallowance 31,38,876 Considered by AO as pertaining to House 85,29,558 38.16% of the total

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

House Property – Suo motu disallowed by assessee Additional disallowance 31,38,876 Considered by AO as pertaining to House 85,29,558 38.16% of the total

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

House Property – Suo motu disallowed by assessee Additional disallowance 31,38,876 Considered by AO as pertaining to House 85,29,558 38.16% of the total

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

property in order to take advantage of standard\ndeduction u/s 24(a) of the Act. Accordingly, he relying on above\nfacts and some judicial pronouncements, disallowed the claim of the\nassessee that rent received of Rs.2,82,16,861/-was income from House

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1 , KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

property in order to take advantage of standard\ndeduction u/s 24(a) of the Act. Accordingly, he relying on above\nfacts and some judicial pronouncements, disallowed the claim of the\nassessee that rent received of Rs.2,82,16,861/-was income from House

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

property in order to take advantage of standard\ndeduction u/s 24(a) of the Act. Accordingly, he relying on above\nfacts and some judicial pronouncements, disallowed the claim of the\nassessee that rent received of Rs.2,82,16,861/-was income from House

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

property in order to take advantage of standard\ndeduction u/s 24(a) of the Act. Accordingly, he relying on above\nfacts and some judicial pronouncements, disallowed the claim of the\nassessee that rent received of Rs.2,82,16,861/-was income from House

THE MANJIRI STUD FARM P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 2(2)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia () & Shri G Manjunatha ()

disallowance of expenditure relatable to income from house property has allowed deductions towards property maintenance expenses already disallowed by the assessee