THE KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.584/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17) The Kanaka Mahalakshmi Vs. Dcit/Acit, Cooperative Bank Limited, Circle-1(1), Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aacft6489J (Appellant) (Respondent) आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.572/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17) Acit, Vs. The Kanaka Mahalakshmi Cooperative Bank Limited, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aacft6489J (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Ms. K. Chudamani, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Shri Shahnawaz Ul Rahman, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 26/11/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 05/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm: The Captioned Cross-Appeals Filed By The Assessee Firm/Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income

68 of the Act. The CIT(A) observed that the assessee society had filed before him additional evidence under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The CIT(A) observed that as the assessment order was passed under section 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act, without affording a proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee bank, thus

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEPORIDE PHARMACEUTICALS, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERANAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS WELLHOPE AGRITECH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NUTRIENT MARINE FOODS LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. GOLUGURI SRIRAMA REDDY, BHIMAVARAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. REAL GROW EXIMS PRIVATE LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERANAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

BOPPANA ASHOK KUMAR,GANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VIJAYAWADA

Bench: Us:

68 of the Act by considering the agricultural income as unexplained. 4. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of appeal hearing.” 2. Succinctly stated, the assessee had filed his return of income for A.Y. 2021-22, declaring an income of Rs. 2,45,900/-. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment under

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

251/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and accordingly, the Ld. AO issued statutory notices and called for certain information with regard to the claims made by the assessee. In reply, the assessee’s Authorized Representative appeared before the Ld. AO and filed replies to the notices as well as made submissions in support of the assessee’s claim

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

251/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and accordingly, the Ld. AO issued statutory notices and called for certain information with regard to the claims made by the assessee. In reply, the assessee’s Authorized Representative appeared before the Ld. AO and filed replies to the notices as well as made submissions in support of the assessee’s claim

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. M/S. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

251/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and accordingly, the Ld. AO issued statutory notices and called for certain information with regard to the claims made by the assessee. In reply, the assessee’s Authorized Representative appeared before the Ld. AO and filed replies to the notices as well as made submissions in support of the assessee’s claim

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

251/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and accordingly, the Ld. AO issued statutory notices and called for certain information with regard to the claims made by the assessee. In reply, the assessee’s Authorized Representative appeared before the Ld. AO and filed replies to the notices as well as made submissions in support of the assessee’s claim

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

251/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and accordingly, the Ld. AO issued statutory notices and called for certain information with regard to the claims made by the assessee. In reply, the assessee’s Authorized Representative appeared before the Ld. AO and filed replies to the notices as well as made submissions in support of the assessee’s claim