BOPPANA ASHOK KUMAR,GANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VIJAYAWADA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the CIT(A) has a statutory obligation under the Income Tax Act to dispose of appeals on merits and lacks the power to summarily dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution. Citing judicial precedent, it set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case back for fresh adjudication on merits after providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee declared agricultural income of Rs. 28.44 lakhs but could not substantiate expenses or sales details, leading the AO to re-characterize it as 'income from other sources'. The assessee's subsequent appeal to the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-prosecution due to repeated non-appearance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) can dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution without considering it on merits, and the extent of the CIT(A)'s statutory duties in appellate proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(2),Section 143(3),Section 68,Section 246A,Section 250,Section 251(1)(a),Section 251(1)(b),Section 251(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
- CIT v. B.N. Bhattacharya & Another1,656 citing118 ITR 461 · 1997 · SC
- CIT v. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF)659 citing297 CTR 614 · 2017 · HC
- New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT351 citing296 ITR 495 · 2008 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench
आदेशकी प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-
1. 1. निर्धाररती/The Assessee : Boppana Ashok Kumar, D.No.1-114, Sri Nagar Colony, Davigigudem, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : The Income Tax Officer, Ward –3(1), Vijayawada.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Ellapu Narasamma L/R of Late Ellapu Appa… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3), VisakhapatnamVisakhapatnam26 Jun 2025Remanded
Also relies on New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) cannot dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution and is statutorily obligated to decide on merits. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside.
- Jitenderpal Singh Ahluwalia, Raipur vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…Raipur27 Oct 2023Remanded
Also relies on New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT and 1 other authority
The ITAT held that the CIT(Appeals) cannot dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution and is statutorily obligated to decide the appeal on merits. The order of the CIT(Appeals) was set aside.
- U S Roofs Ltd., Navi Mumbai vs Addl/Jt/Dy/ACIT/ITO, Nfe-Ass C, Delhi…Mumbai27 Sept 2023Remanded
Also relies on New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal condoned the delay, citing the medical emergencies as a sufficient cause. The Tribunal also held that the Commissioner (Appeals) is obligated to decide appeals on merits and cannot dismiss them for non-prose...
- C R Jaiswal and K B Jaiswal, Village Kingaon vs Income Tax Officer, Ward -2(5), JalgaonPune14 Sept 2023Remanded
Also relies on New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) is not empowered to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution and must decide on merits. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for de novo adjudication.
- Vahan Motors Private Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Circle-8(1), HyderabadHyderabad28 Apr 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without considering the merits. The Tribunal stated that the CIT(A) has a statutory obligation to dispose of appeals on merits and cann...
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mohit Jain vs. Union Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Gopal Yadav vs. Union BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Infinix Inftoech vs. Utkarsh Small Fianance BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Chandra Shekhar Dayar vs. Hdfc BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
