BOPPANA ASHOK KUMAR,GANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VIJAYAWADA
ITA 392/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2021-22
Bench: Us:
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68
68 of the Act by considering the agricultural income as unexplained.
4. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of appeal hearing.”
2. Succinctly stated, the assessee had filed his return of income for A.Y. 2021-22, declaring an income of Rs. 2,45,900/-. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment under
