BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

83 results for “reassessment”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,404Delhi1,308Kolkata438Chennai407Ahmedabad368Jaipur365Bangalore227Chandigarh144Pune131Hyderabad130Rajkot121Indore116Surat112Visakhapatnam83Nagpur81Cochin73Amritsar71Raipur65Guwahati64Agra47Lucknow42Patna37Jodhpur25Allahabad20Cuttack20Calcutta6Dehradun5Ranchi5Telangana5Varanasi4SC2Panaji2Orissa2Karnataka2Gauhati1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 148118Section 153A80Section 143(3)69Addition to Income67Section 13242Section 143(2)40Section 14734Section 6831Cash Deposit30

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 172/VIZ/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credits c. Rs.21,67,998/- towards undisclosed income?” The assessee raised additional ground for the A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2008-09 also on identical issues. The contention of the assessee in additional ground for the A.Ys. 2004-05 to 2008-09 is related to issue of validity of additions made without having the seized material. The Ld.AR during

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

Showing 1–20 of 83 · Page 1 of 5

Search & Seizure27
Unexplained Cash Credit24
Section 69A23

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 174/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credits c. Rs.21,67,998/- towards undisclosed income?” The assessee raised additional ground for the A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2008-09 also on identical issues. The contention of the assessee in additional ground for the A.Ys. 2004-05 to 2008-09 is related to issue of validity of additions made without having the seized material. The Ld.AR during

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 171/VIZ/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credits c. Rs.21,67,998/- towards undisclosed income?” The assessee raised additional ground for the A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2008-09 also on identical issues. The contention of the assessee in additional ground for the A.Ys. 2004-05 to 2008-09 is related to issue of validity of additions made without having the seized material. The Ld.AR during

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 170/VIZ/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credits c. Rs.21,67,998/- towards undisclosed income?” The assessee raised additional ground for the A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2008-09 also on identical issues. The contention of the assessee in additional ground for the A.Ys. 2004-05 to 2008-09 is related to issue of validity of additions made without having the seized material. The Ld.AR during

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 169/VIZ/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credits c. Rs.21,67,998/- towards undisclosed income?” The assessee raised additional ground for the A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2008-09 also on identical issues. The contention of the assessee in additional ground for the A.Ys. 2004-05 to 2008-09 is related to issue of validity of additions made without having the seized material. The Ld.AR during

MYNENI VENKATA RAO,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 130/VIZ/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credits c. Rs.21,67,998/- towards undisclosed income?” The assessee raised additional ground for the A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2008-09 also on identical issues. The contention of the assessee in additional ground for the A.Ys. 2004-05 to 2008-09 is related to issue of validity of additions made without having the seized material. The Ld.AR during

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 168/VIZ/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credits c. Rs.21,67,998/- towards undisclosed income?” The assessee raised additional ground for the A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2008-09 also on identical issues. The contention of the assessee in additional ground for the A.Ys. 2004-05 to 2008-09 is related to issue of validity of additions made without having the seized material. The Ld.AR during

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 173/VIZ/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credits c. Rs.21,67,998/- towards undisclosed income?” The assessee raised additional ground for the A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2008-09 also on identical issues. The contention of the assessee in additional ground for the A.Ys. 2004-05 to 2008-09 is related to issue of validity of additions made without having the seized material. The Ld.AR during

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 34/VIZ/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

unexplained cash credit within the meaning of Section 68 of the Act. 17. Ostensibly, the CIT(A) had merely gone by the submissions filed by the assessee company before him and held the impugned loan received from M/s Aneri Fincap Limited (supra) as a genuine loan. We find that the CIT(A) was of the view that the assessee company

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 36/VIZ/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

unexplained cash credit within the meaning of Section 68 of the Act. 17. Ostensibly, the CIT(A) had merely gone by the submissions filed by the assessee company before him and held the impugned loan received from M/s Aneri Fincap Limited (supra) as a genuine loan. We find that the CIT(A) was of the view that the assessee company

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 35/VIZ/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

unexplained cash credit within the meaning of Section 68 of the Act. 17. Ostensibly, the CIT(A) had merely gone by the submissions filed by the assessee company before him and held the impugned loan received from M/s Aneri Fincap Limited (supra) as a genuine loan. We find that the CIT(A) was of the view that the assessee company

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 37/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

unexplained cash credit within the meaning of Section 68 of the Act. 17. Ostensibly, the CIT(A) had merely gone by the submissions filed by the assessee company before him and held the impugned loan received from M/s Aneri Fincap Limited (supra) as a genuine loan. We find that the CIT(A) was of the view that the assessee company

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 38/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

unexplained cash credit within the meaning of Section 68 of the Act. 17. Ostensibly, the CIT(A) had merely gone by the submissions filed by the assessee company before him and held the impugned loan received from M/s Aneri Fincap Limited (supra) as a genuine loan. We find that the CIT(A) was of the view that the assessee company

A.SRINIVASA RAO,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4), , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 518/VIZ/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Sept 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.518/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10) Sri A.Srinivasa Rao Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.48-13-20/1, F.No.Sf2 Ward-1(4) Sri Krishna Sai Residency Visakhapatnam Janaki Rama Street Visakhapatnam [Pan :Adhpa2185Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Shri B.Rama Krishna, DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

unexplained cash credits recorded in the books of accounts. 3 ITA No.518/Viz/2018, A.Y.2009-10 A.Srinivasa Rao, Visakhapatnam The Ld.AR during the appeal hearing submitted that the additional ground raised by the assessee is a legal ground which does not require any factual verification or reference therefore, argued that as held by the Hon’ble Apex court in the case of NTPC

BHAVANASI ANJANEYULU vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 262/VIZ/2017[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam19 Jan 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.261, 262 & 263/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Years: 2005-06, 2007-08 & 2008-09) Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Acit, Central Circle Guntur Vijayawada [Pan No.Acjpb0329C] (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Debakumar Sonowal
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

credit u/s.68 of the l.T Act. The A.O. is of the opinion that the assessee the person who gifted the amount. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the A.O., the assessee went on appeal before the CIT(A) and the Ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved by the order

BHAVANASI ANJANEYULU vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 263/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam19 Jan 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.261, 262 & 263/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Years: 2005-06, 2007-08 & 2008-09) Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Acit, Central Circle Guntur Vijayawada [Pan No.Acjpb0329C] (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Debakumar Sonowal
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

credit u/s.68 of the l.T Act. The A.O. is of the opinion that the assessee the person who gifted the amount. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the A.O., the assessee went on appeal before the CIT(A) and the Ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved by the order

BHAVANASI ANJANEYULU vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 261/VIZ/2017[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam19 Jan 2018AY 2005-2006

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.261, 262 & 263/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Years: 2005-06, 2007-08 & 2008-09) Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Acit, Central Circle Guntur Vijayawada [Pan No.Acjpb0329C] (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Debakumar Sonowal
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

credit u/s.68 of the l.T Act. The A.O. is of the opinion that the assessee the person who gifted the amount. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the A.O., the assessee went on appeal before the CIT(A) and the Ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved by the order

GHANTA PUNNA RAO,GUNTUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), , GUNTUR

In the result, the appeal and cross objection filed by the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 179/VIZ/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Nov 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.179/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2011-2012) Ghanta Punna Rao Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of 3Rd Floor, Varandas Apartments Income Tax 1/3, Navabharat Nagar Circle-2(1) Guntur Guntur [Pan : Adupg3613J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.354/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. Ghanta Punna Rao Income Tax 3Rd Floor, Varandas Apartments Circle-2(1) 1/3, Navabharat Nagar Guntur Guntur [Pan : Adupg3613J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.124/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.354/Viz/2019) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2011-2012) Ghanta Punna Rao Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of 3Rd Floor, Varandas Apartments Income Tax 1/3, Navabharat Nagar Circle-2(1) Guntur Guntur [Pan : Adupg3613J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 68

reassessment proceedings, the AO found that the assessee has made cash deposits in Andhra Bank, Brundavan Gardens Branch, Guntur, during the period 01.10.2010 to 24.12.2010. It was further found that the assessee has shown the receipts from sale of agricultural land over and above the registered value of sale deeds and explained before the AO that his son, Shri G.Kalyan

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ANUMOLU TIRUPATI RAYUDU(HUF),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 100/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credit U/s. 68 of the Act and added the same to the total income of the assessee. 5. The Ld. AO further noted from the books of account that the assessee claimed Rs. 56,34,856/- as finance charges payable to M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd and no tax U/s. 194A was deducted thereon. Since the assessee

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 103/VIZ/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

unexplained cash credit U/s. 68 of the Act and added the same to the total income of the assessee. 5. The Ld. AO further noted from the books of account that the assessee claimed Rs. 56,34,856/- as finance charges payable to M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd and no tax U/s. 194A was deducted thereon. Since the assessee