BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “reassessment”+ Section 234clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi451Mumbai275Bangalore168Jaipur115Chennai69Ahmedabad55Chandigarh53Kolkata48Hyderabad40Cuttack35Nagpur18Patna17Agra17Raipur16Guwahati15Lucknow15Indore12Pune11Ranchi9Surat9Amritsar9Visakhapatnam8Dehradun7Rajkot7Cochin6SC5Karnataka4Kerala3Telangana2Jodhpur1Calcutta1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 153A12Section 143(3)8Section 2636Addition to Income6Section 133A3Section 103Section 113Section 2(24)3Section 1323

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 102/VIZ/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

234 (Kerala); (ii) Judgment of the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Gopal Lal Bhadruka vs. DCIT reported in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 167 (Andhra Pradesh); (iii) Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. NRA Iron & Steel (P.) Ltd reported in [2019] 103 taxmann.com 48 (SC) in support

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Exemption3
Survey u/s 133A3
Search & Seizure3
ITA 103/VIZ/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

234 (Kerala); (ii) Judgment of the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Gopal Lal Bhadruka vs. DCIT reported in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 167 (Andhra Pradesh); (iii) Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. NRA Iron & Steel (P.) Ltd reported in [2019] 103 taxmann.com 48 (SC) in support

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ANUMOLU TIRUPATI RAYUDU(HUF),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 100/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

234 (Kerala); (ii) Judgment of the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Gopal Lal Bhadruka vs. DCIT reported in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 167 (Andhra Pradesh); (iii) Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. NRA Iron & Steel (P.) Ltd reported in [2019] 103 taxmann.com 48 (SC) in support

ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. SRI PRAKASH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, TUNI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue for the

ITA 465/VIZ/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 10Section 11Section 133ASection 2(24)

234 (Hyd), the Hyderabad Bench of the Tribunal followed an earlier decision of the Hyderabad Bench in the case of Society for Integrated Development in Urban and Rural Areas reported in 90 ITD 493 (Hyd) wherein the Tribunal followed the order of another coordinate bench in the case of Nirmal Agricultural Society (2000) 67 TTJ (Hyd) and recorded the observations

ACIT, EXEMPTIONS,, VIJAYAWADA vs. SRI PRAKASHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, TUNII

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue for the

ITA 467/VIZ/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 10Section 11Section 133ASection 2(24)

234 (Hyd), the Hyderabad Bench of the Tribunal followed an earlier decision of the Hyderabad Bench in the case of Society for Integrated Development in Urban and Rural Areas reported in 90 ITD 493 (Hyd) wherein the Tribunal followed the order of another coordinate bench in the case of Nirmal Agricultural Society (2000) 67 TTJ (Hyd) and recorded the observations

ACIT, (EXEMPTIONS), EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA vs. SRI PRAKASH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, TUNI,

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue for the

ITA 382/VIZ/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 10Section 11Section 133ASection 2(24)

234 (Hyd), the Hyderabad Bench of the Tribunal followed an earlier decision of the Hyderabad Bench in the case of Society for Integrated Development in Urban and Rural Areas reported in 90 ITD 493 (Hyd) wherein the Tribunal followed the order of another coordinate bench in the case of Nirmal Agricultural Society (2000) 67 TTJ (Hyd) and recorded the observations

M/S. vs. R INFOTECH ,,VISAKHAPATNAMVS.THE ITO ,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 373/VIZ/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AR
Section 143(3)Section 263

reassessment allowing the exemption claimed u/s 10B of the Act. M/s. VSR Infotech, Visakhapatnam 8. In the assessment year 2010-11, the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act allowing the exemption u/s 10B of the Act. The A.O. completed the assessment in the assessment year 2010-11 also after verification of the eligibility of the assessee with

M/S. vs. R INFOTECH ,,VISAKHAPATNAMVS.THE ITO ,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 374/VIZ/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AR
Section 143(3)Section 263

reassessment allowing the exemption claimed u/s 10B of the Act. M/s. VSR Infotech, Visakhapatnam 8. In the assessment year 2010-11, the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act allowing the exemption u/s 10B of the Act. The A.O. completed the assessment in the assessment year 2010-11 also after verification of the eligibility of the assessee with