BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “reassessment”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi429Mumbai390Chennai157Bangalore153Jaipur109Ahmedabad97Kolkata91Hyderabad85Chandigarh70Raipur51Guwahati39Pune34Indore34Cochin30Patna22Cuttack22Lucknow22Rajkot17Dehradun14Visakhapatnam13Amritsar13Surat8Jodhpur4Karnataka4Panaji3Nagpur3SC3Allahabad3Ranchi2Telangana2Orissa2Agra2Jabalpur1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 153C14Section 153A12Addition to Income11Section 143(3)10Section 1478Section 2636Section 1315Section 148A5Section 1325

VENKATA LAKSHMI PADMAVATHI UPPALAPU,VIJAYAWADA vs. ITO, WARD - 2(3), VIJAYAWADA

ITA 299/VIZ/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Jun 2025AY 2013-14
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69A

reassessment\nproceedings under section 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act by making and addition of\nPage No. 2\nRs. 1,97,81,600/- under section 69A of the Act on account of unexplained money\nand determined total income of the assessee at Rs.1,98,61,220

M/S. vs. R INFOTECH ,,VISAKHAPATNAMVS.THE ITO ,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 374/VIZ/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam
Bogus/Accommodation Entry5
Bogus Purchases5
Search & Seizure3
28 Feb 2018
AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AR
Section 143(3)Section 263

220/- on 29.8.2008. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened u/s 148 of the Act on 29.2.2012 for verification of the assessee’s eligibility regarding the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 10B of the Act. The assessee had claimed exemption of ` 53,07,039/- u/s 10B of the Act for the A.Y.2008-09. For the A.Y2010-11 the assessee has claimed

M/S. vs. R INFOTECH ,,VISAKHAPATNAMVS.THE ITO ,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 373/VIZ/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AR
Section 143(3)Section 263

220/- on 29.8.2008. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened u/s 148 of the Act on 29.2.2012 for verification of the assessee’s eligibility regarding the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 10B of the Act. The assessee had claimed exemption of ` 53,07,039/- u/s 10B of the Act for the A.Y.2008-09. For the A.Y2010-11 the assessee has claimed

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 102/VIZ/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

reassess " to completed assessment proceedings. (vi) Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each assessment year on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 103/VIZ/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

reassess " to completed assessment proceedings. (vi) Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each assessment year on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ANUMOLU TIRUPATI RAYUDU(HUF),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 100/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

reassess " to completed assessment proceedings. (vi) Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each assessment year on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record

SESHA SAI TOWNSHIP PVT.LTD.,,HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 301/VIZ/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam11 Jan 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.301 & 302/Viz/2015 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2007-2008 & 2008-09) Sri Sesha Sai Township P. Ltd. Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.40-7-9/1, 1St Floor Income Tax Moghalrajpuram Road Central Circle Labbipet Vijayawada Vijayawada [Pan : Aakcs2094K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri M.Chandramouleswara Rao, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri M.ChandramouleswaraFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153C

220 (Delhi). Hon’ble High court of Delhi held as under: “6. On a plain reading of Section 153C, it is evident that the Assessing Officer of the searched person must be "satisfied" that inter alia any document seized or requisitioned "belongs to" a person other than the searched person. It is only then that the Assessing Officer

SESHA SAI TOWNSHIP PVT.LTD.,,HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 302/VIZ/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.301 & 302/Viz/2015 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2007-2008 & 2008-09) Sri Sesha Sai Township P. Ltd. Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.40-7-9/1, 1St Floor Income Tax Moghalrajpuram Road Central Circle Labbipet Vijayawada Vijayawada [Pan : Aakcs2094K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri M.Chandramouleswara Rao, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri M.ChandramouleswaraFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153C

220 (Delhi). Hon’ble High court of Delhi held as under: “6. On a plain reading of Section 153C, it is evident that the Assessing Officer of the searched person must be "satisfied" that inter alia any document seized or requisitioned "belongs to" a person other than the searched person. It is only then that the Assessing Officer

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 36/VIZ/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

220/-. 11. Aggrieved, the assessee company carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A), who found favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee company and reiterated the view that was taken by him on merits while disposing off the assessee’s appeal against the earlier order u/s 147 of the Act, dated 25.03.2022. Accordingly, the CIT(A) held

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 38/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

220/-. 11. Aggrieved, the assessee company carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A), who found favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee company and reiterated the view that was taken by him on merits while disposing off the assessee’s appeal against the earlier order u/s 147 of the Act, dated 25.03.2022. Accordingly, the CIT(A) held

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 34/VIZ/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

220/-. 11. Aggrieved, the assessee company carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A), who found favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee company and reiterated the view that was taken by him on merits while disposing off the assessee’s appeal against the earlier order u/s 147 of the Act, dated 25.03.2022. Accordingly, the CIT(A) held

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 37/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

220/-. 11. Aggrieved, the assessee company carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A), who found favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee company and reiterated the view that was taken by him on merits while disposing off the assessee’s appeal against the earlier order u/s 147 of the Act, dated 25.03.2022. Accordingly, the CIT(A) held

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 35/VIZ/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

220/-. 11. Aggrieved, the assessee company carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A), who found favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee company and reiterated the view that was taken by him on merits while disposing off the assessee’s appeal against the earlier order u/s 147 of the Act, dated 25.03.2022. Accordingly, the CIT(A) held