BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Deemed Dividendclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai245Delhi123Chennai73Ahmedabad64Hyderabad58Chandigarh53Bangalore51Raipur30Kolkata22Jaipur21Pune11Nagpur10Surat9Lucknow8Cochin6Guwahati5Indore4Rajkot4Dehradun2Cuttack2Visakhapatnam2Amritsar2Jodhpur2

Key Topics

Section 148A6Section 80P5Section 1485Section 142(1)3Section 143(3)2Section 143(2)2Reopening of Assessment2Addition to Income2

ARIMILLI RAMA KRISHNA,WEST GODAVARI DIST vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

ITA 639/VIZ/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Mar 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Ble

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194CSection 194JSection 2(22)(e)Section 263

reassessment proceedings are liable to be quashed. 4. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is not justified in not quashing the assessment order passed by the assessing officer on the ground that the notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was not issued within the time stipulated under the Act. 5. Without prejudice to Ground no.2

PANDALAPAKA PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OP SOCIETY LTD,EAST GODAVARI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KAKINADA

ITA 438/VIZ/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Jan 2025AY 2020-21
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 148ASection 80P

deemed to have been inhibited from acting in pursuance\nof the section 148A(b) notice till the relevant material was supplied to the\nassessees. Ld.AR also placed reliance in the case of Anurag Gupta v. ITO by\nthe Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Writ Pet No. 10184 of 2022 dated\n13.03.2023 wherein it was held that issuance of notice