Search: penalty u/s 271

45 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 2(47)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 142(1)42 Section 153C30 Addition to Income30 Section 14428 Survey u/s 133A25 Section 133A24 Section 271(1)(c)17 Section 276C14 Section 271(1)(b)

T.SAIMATHA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 318/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Mar 2020AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.318/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2008-09) T.Saimatha Vs Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.47-11-9 Income Tax Dwarakanagar Circle-1(1) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan :Acdpt7788H] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.320/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) T.Satyanarayana Vs Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.47-11-9 Income Tax Dwarakanagar Circle-1(1) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan :Aaqpt9170N] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri V.Rama Mohan, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 28.02.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04.03.2020 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri V.Rama Mohan, DR

Section 132Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

section, the action u/s 271(1)(c) is not permissible. Since the AO has not levied the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), he has rightly initiated the penalty u/s 271AAA and imposed the penalty since search was conducted and the undisclosed income was assessed. Therefore, argued that the AO has rightly levied the penalty and there is no mistake

Showing 1–20 of 45 · Page 1 of 3

T.SAIMATHA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

T.SAIMATHA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

MOTHUKURI SOMABRAHMAM,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI M. SOMABRAHMAM,, VISAKHAPATNAM

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO,,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

B.ADINARAYANA,,ANAKAPALLE vs. THE ITO,, ANAKAPALLE

T.SATYANARAYANA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, GUNTUR vs. SILEMANKHAN & MAHABOOBKHAN, GUNTUR