Search: penalty u/s 271

120 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 143(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)176 Section 143(3)84 Penalty66 Addition to Income62 Section 14840 Section 143(2)38 Section 271D31 Section 27428 Section 234E

T.SAIMATHA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 318/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Mar 2020AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.318/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2008-09) T.Saimatha Vs Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.47-11-9 Income Tax Dwarakanagar Circle-1(1) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan :Acdpt7788H] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.320/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) T.Satyanarayana Vs Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.47-11-9 Income Tax Dwarakanagar Circle-1(1) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan :Aaqpt9170N] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri V.Rama Mohan, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 28.02.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04.03.2020 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri V.Rama Mohan, DR

Section 132Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

2 (3), Ahmedabad [2015] 63 taxmann.com 363 (Ahmedabad-Trib), wherein the coordinate bench held that initiation of penalty u/s 271AAA and levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not permissible. 7. Per contra, the Ld.DR submitted that though the AO had initiated the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the AO has not levied the penalty u/s 271AAA, therefore

Showing 1–20 of 120 · Page 1 of 6

T.SAIMATHA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

T.SAIMATHA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

OMCON REIGN FOREST PROJECTS,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM

OMCON REIGN FOREST PROJECTS, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM

VENKATA RAMA SATYANARAYANA VARMA VEGESNA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI M. SOMABRAHMAM,, VISAKHAPATNAM

MOTHUKURI SOMABRAHMAM,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VENKATA SITA RAMACHANDRA RAO KANCHUMARTHY, RAJAHMUNDRY

KOSANAM RAMA RAO,GUNTUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), GUNTUR

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, , VISAKHAPTNAM

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASST. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,, VISAKHAPATNAM

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ADDL. CIT.,, VISAKHAPATNAM

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

VISAKHAPATNAM INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1), VISAKHAPATNAM