Search: penalty u/s 271

60 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 132(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 153C58 Section 142(1)43 Section 13235 Addition to Income35 Section 271(1)(c)33 Section 153A31 Section 143(3)30 Section 234E28 Section 144

T.SAIMATHA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 318/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Mar 2020AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.318/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2008-09) T.Saimatha Vs Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.47-11-9 Income Tax Dwarakanagar Circle-1(1) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan :Acdpt7788H] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.320/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) T.Satyanarayana Vs Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.47-11-9 Income Tax Dwarakanagar Circle-1(1) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan :Aaqpt9170N] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri V.Rama Mohan, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 28.02.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04.03.2020 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri V.Rama Mohan, DR

Section 132Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

132 of the Act, certain incriminating material was found and seized marked as SRP/1 to 47 and the Assessing Officer (AO) made the addition of Rs.1,58,59,811/- as undisclosed profit and initiated penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 2.1. Similarly, in the case of Sri T.Satyanarayana, addition was made on account of undisclosed profit

Showing 1–20 of 60 · Page 1 of 3

T.SAIMATHA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

T.SAIMATHA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

OMCON REIGN FOREST PROJECTS, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM

OMCON REIGN FOREST PROJECTS,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM

MOTHUKURI SOMABRAHMAM,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI M. SOMABRAHMAM,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, GUNTUR vs. SILEMANKHAN & MAHABOOBKHAN, GUNTUR

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. HARI PRASAD BHARARIA, VISAKHAPATNAM

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO,,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA

MEKALA KAMESWARA RAO, ,SATTENAPALLI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA