Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Bogus Purchasesclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)6 Section 143(2)4 Section 1314 Section 1324 Condonation of Delay4 Penalty3 Section 732 Section 143(3)2 Section 271A

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI M. SOMABRAHMAM,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the

ITA 126/VIZ/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2018AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri T. Satyanandam, DRFor Respondent: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AR

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1)(c)/271AAB of the Act. The assessee admitted additional income for the assessment year 2013-14 with the following breakup: Sl. Description Amount No. Cheques deposited into the bank account of my 1 56,74,868.00 employees (present & former) 2 Gold jewellery weighing 1530.40 gms 55,94,482.00 3 22 carats of diamonds 11,79,350.00 4 Silver

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI M. SOMABRAHMAM,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI M. SOMABRAHMAM,, VISAKHAPATNAM

MOTHUKURI SOMABRAHMAM,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

MS USHA TUBUS & PIPES PVT LTD.,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM