BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 397clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi386Karnataka357Mumbai197Bangalore138Hyderabad95Jaipur93Chennai81Kolkata41Chandigarh32Ahmedabad30Telangana30Indore29Raipur24Cochin16Calcutta16Agra14Surat11Pune10Cuttack10Dehradun8Lucknow7Guwahati7Nagpur6Rajkot6Rajasthan5Visakhapatnam4SC3Amritsar3Orissa2Jodhpur2Patna1Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 153A12Section 143(3)7Section 54F5Addition to Income4Search & Seizure4Section 153C3Section 1323

KAKILETI SATYANARAYANA,MANDAPETA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 673/VIZ/2019[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Nov 2020AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Sonawal, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 54F

section 54F, the assessee is supposed to acquire a residential house within a period of one year before or two years after the date on which the transfer took place purchased, or has within a period of three years after that date constructed a residential house, the capital gain arose out of the transaction will be taxed accordingly

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ANUMOLU TIRUPATI RAYUDU(HUF),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 100/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

397 ITR (St.) 9-Ed. Therefore the Ld. DR pleaded the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the additions made by the Ld. AO may be set-aside and prayed for restoring the order of the Ld. AO. 15. On the other hand, Learned Authorized Representative [Ld. AR] argued that the reopening of assessment

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 103/VIZ/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

397 ITR (St.) 9-Ed. Therefore the Ld. DR pleaded the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the additions made by the Ld. AO may be set-aside and prayed for restoring the order of the Ld. AO. 15. On the other hand, Learned Authorized Representative [Ld. AR] argued that the reopening of assessment

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 102/VIZ/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

397 ITR (St.) 9-Ed. Therefore the Ld. DR pleaded the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the additions made by the Ld. AO may be set-aside and prayed for restoring the order of the Ld. AO. 15. On the other hand, Learned Authorized Representative [Ld. AR] argued that the reopening of assessment