BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

109 results for “house property”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,310Mumbai1,111Chennai425Bangalore367Jaipur340Hyderabad291Kolkata196Cochin192Chandigarh189Ahmedabad186Pune130Indore127Karnataka110Visakhapatnam109Amritsar78Surat58Lucknow56Nagpur45Raipur43Calcutta40Cuttack39Telangana37Rajkot34Guwahati31Agra29Ranchi12Jodhpur11Patna11SC10Allahabad10Varanasi8Rajasthan7Dehradun5Jabalpur5Kerala2Orissa1J&K1Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 14893Section 143(3)80Addition to Income80Section 143(2)46Section 14737Section 153A31Cash Deposit30Survey u/s 133A27Section 69A26

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. POTLURI PHANENDRS BABU , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the revenue as well as the cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 491/VIZ/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Nov 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.491/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2012-2013) Income Tax Officer Vs. Sri Potluri Phanendra Babu Ward – 3(2) 1St Floor, Infinity Towers, Visakhapatnam Sankara Matham Road Visakhapatnam [Pan : Agspp7638K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.132/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.491/Viz/2019) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2012-2013) Sri Potluri Phanendra Babu Vs. Income Tax Officer 1St Floor, Infinity Towers, Ward – 3(2) Sankara Matham Road Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Agspp7638K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt. U.Mini Chandran, DR

property. It is further observed that there was opening cash balance of Rs.8,59,76,000/- which is available to the assessee. The Ld.CIT(A) also found that while taking the cash deposits as undisclosed income, the AO did not consider the cash withdrawals made from the bank which is amounting to Rs.1,39,23,009/-. The total cash available

Showing 1–20 of 109 · Page 1 of 6

Section 54F26
Section 133A26
House Property23

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VITTALAM NATARAJ PRASAD, TIRUPATI

In the result, Cross Objection raised by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1/VIZ/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Pawan Chakrapani, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

housing loan, interest on Secured Overdraft (SOD) and confirmation letter from Smt. Nallamilli Sri Devi towards loan given by the assessee. Further, the Ld. AO also requested the assessee to furnish the sources for increase in capital, properties purchased, investments, loans and advances during the FY 2013-14 and also asked to furnish the sources towards cash deposits

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NALLAMILLI SRIDEVI,, TIRUPATI

In the result, Cross Objection raised by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2/VIZ/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Pawan Chakrapani, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

housing loan, interest on Secured Overdraft (SOD) and confirmation letter from Smt. Nallamilli Sri Devi towards loan given by the assessee. Further, the Ld. AO also requested the assessee to furnish the sources for increase in capital, properties purchased, investments, loans and advances during the FY 2013-14 and also asked to furnish the sources towards cash deposits

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NALLAMILLI SRIDEVI,, TIRUPATI

In the result, Cross Objection raised by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 3/VIZ/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Pawan Chakrapani, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

housing loan, interest on Secured Overdraft (SOD) and confirmation letter from Smt. Nallamilli Sri Devi towards loan given by the assessee. Further, the Ld. AO also requested the assessee to furnish the sources for increase in capital, properties purchased, investments, loans and advances during the FY 2013-14 and also asked to furnish the sources towards cash deposits

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VITTALAM NATARAJ PRASAD, TIRUPATI

In the result, Cross Objection raised by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 247/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Pawan Chakrapani, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

housing loan, interest on Secured Overdraft (SOD) and confirmation letter from Smt. Nallamilli Sri Devi towards loan given by the assessee. Further, the Ld. AO also requested the assessee to furnish the sources for increase in capital, properties purchased, investments, loans and advances during the FY 2013-14 and also asked to furnish the sources towards cash deposits

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONALTAXATION, , VIJAYAWADA vs. KRISHNA MOHAN MALEMPATI, WELLINGTON MANOR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 121/VIZ/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 50C

house property. The contention of the Ld. AO could not be accepted as it is prerogative of the assessee to withdraw cash as per his requirements and the Department cannot dictate the manner in which the assessee should withdraw the cash. Further, we find that the Ld. AO has not questioned the source of deposits

ASHA SANGHAVI,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, , RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 33/VIZ/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.33/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2011-12) Smt.Asha Sanghavi Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.7-22-12 Ward-2 Nandepu Heights Rajamahendravaram T.Nagar Rajamahendravaram [Pan : Awfps2816R] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri D.Manoj Kumar, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 06.11.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.11.2019 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.Manoj Kumar, DR
Section 143(2)Section 68

cash deposits made in bank accounts of the assessee as unexplained income. 5. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, an individual, deriving income from house property

KANCHAN LALWANI,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 484/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 56(2)(x)Section 68

deposited into bank account cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit in the books of account of the assessee which can be considered as addition u/s.68 of the Act. The bank pass book supplied by the bank to the assessee cannot be regarded as the books of account of the assessee. We find that the assessee is an individual

VENKATA RAMANA VOONNA,SRIKAKULAM vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SRIKAKULAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 251/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.251/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Venkata Ramana Voonna, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Srikakulam. Ward-1, Pan: Abipv2254N Srikakulam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri I. Kama Sastry, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04/09/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of : 25/09/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

For Appellant: Sri I. Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 69A

property was transferred to 2-person. The sale deed dated 27/05/2011 reveals that out of 2 persons, one is employee and other person is doing business. Besides assessee, both persons will have bank accounts and can insist for payment other than mode of cash. (ii) Further the submission of the assessee that amount received in FY 2014-15 was kept

SMT. KANCHARLAPALLI HEMALATHA,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ITO,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 322/VIZ/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam06 Nov 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.322/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2010-2011) Smt.Kancharlapalli Hemalatha Vs. Income Tax Officer Flat No.102, Sri Kesava Heights Ward-2(3) D.No.59A-21/3-5/2 Vijayawada Vizayanagar Colony Vijayawada [Pan :Bcmpk6735M] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.L.Narasimha Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Suman Malik, DR
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 54F

cash balance of Rs.7,05,395/- in the bank account of appellant on 30.11.2010. There is an entry of withdrawal of Rs.5,18,180/- on 30.11.2010 by cheque No.663934 with remarks (particulars) Y/S DD. As this amount may represent purchase of DD for Rs.5,16,754/- and DD commission etc., appellant might have applied this amount for purchase of flat

MANGAMMA CHIRUMAMILLA,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 151/VIZ/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148A

property was purchased and the same was sold during the F.Y.2017-18. From the sale proceeds of the house, it was mentioned that the same was 4 Mangamma Chirumamilla invested in fixed deposit and she is having some interest income. As far as the source of cash

MANJU VANI CHIGURUPATI,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 363/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.363/Viz/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) V. Manju Vani Chigurupati Acit – Circle -2(1) C.R. Building, 1St Floor Annex #16, K.C.P. Colony Kanuru, Vijayawada-520007 M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520002 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aazpc9498B] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69A

House property and income other sources. The case was selected for limited scrutiny and accordingly notices under section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued and served on the assessee calling for details. In response, assessee submitted her reply on 16.12.2019 explaining the sources of cash deposits

AMBATI VENKATA SATYA NAGA MALLESWARA RAO,NUZVIDU vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 558/VIZ/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अऩीऱ सं./ I.T.A. No.558/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2016-17) Ambati Venkata Satya Naga Vs. Income Tax Officer, Malleswara Rao, Ward-3(4), Nuzvid, Krishna District, Vijayawada. Andhra Pradesh. Pan: Avcpa 9606 K (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate : Sri Spg Mudaliar, Sr. Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 02/06/2022 घोषणध की तधरीख/Date Of : 08/07/2022 Pronouncement O R D E R Per S. Balakrishnan:

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, Advocate
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A

house property and Rs. 2 lakhs business income as commission agent. The case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS for examination of (i) cash deposit

BANDARU PADMAJA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 468/VIZ/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: The Tribunal. In Respect Of The Belated Filing Of The Appeal, The Assessee Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Along With An Affidavit & The Relevant Contents Are Scanned & Pasted Herein Below:

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

house property and interest income on fixed deposits, filed her return of income on 08/07/2013 admitting a total income of Rs. 3,34,500/-. The case was summarily processed U/s. 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS. Thereafter, notices U/s. 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued to the assessee

SEETHAMRAJU SATYA SURYA VENKATA UMA RANI,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(4), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 512/VIZ/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri K Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble(Hybrid Hearing) आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. 512/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2016-17) Seethamraju Satya Surya Venkata Vs. Income Tax Officer, Uma Rani, Ward-5(4), Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Areps1245A (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar प्रत्यधर्थी की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 69A

property. In response to the said notices, the assessee submitted information through e-portal. On examining the bank statements held by the assessee with Lakshmi Vilas Bank, Dwaraka Nagar Branch, Visakhapatnam, the Ld. AO observed that the assessee was made a cash deposit of Rs. 13 lakhs during FY 2015-16 and the assessee was required to explain the sources

ANURADHA VASIREDDY,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

ITA 113/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.113/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Anuradha Vasireddy, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 29-26-129, Jadagam Vari Street, Ward-2(2), Suryaraopet, Vijayawada-520002, Vijayawada. Andhra Pradesh. Pan: Acjpv6946M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri C. Subrahmanyam, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 22/07/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of : 25/07/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 44ASection 69A

House Property of Rs. 74,222/-, business income U/s. 44AD of Rs. 5,05,107/- and income other sources of Rs. 2,71,800/-. The return was initially processed by the CPC on 24/12/2017. Thereafter, the case was selected for scrutiny through CASSS under the category of ‘limited scrutiny’ on the reason ‘high value cash deposits

PURNACHANDRA RAO MANDAVA,ELURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, ELURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 52/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.52/Viz/2024 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Purnachandra Rao Mandava Vs. Income Tax Officer Ambica Street, Powerpet Ward-2 Eluru Eluru [Pan : Aizpm5102C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Dr.Aparna Villuri, DR
Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A

house property and other sources filed his return of income 2 I.T.A. No.52/Viz/2024, A.Y.2017-18 Purnachandra Rao Mandava, Eluru for the A.Y.2017-18 on 27.03.2018 by admitting total income of Rs.4,07,470/-. Subsequently, the case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS to examine cash deposits

POOSARLA SUBHASH,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ACIT, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 474/VIZ/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.472 & 473/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ A.Ys: 2007-2008 & 2010-11) Pusarla Subhash Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Prop.Sagar Durga Developers Income Tax Door No.15-13-6, Krishnanagar Range-1 Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aigpp2446K] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.474 & 475/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ A.Ys: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Pusarla Subhash Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Prop.Sagar Durga Developers Income Tax Door No.15-13-6, Krishnanagar Circle-1(1) Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aigpp2446K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.481-486/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ A.Ys: 2007-2008 To 2012-13) Income Tax Officer Vs. Pusarla Subhash Ward-1(4) Prop.Sagar Durga Developers Visakhapatnam Door No.15-13-6, Krishnanagar, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aigpp2446K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri C.V.S.Murthy, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr / Shri V.Appala Raju, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02.01.2019 25.01.2019 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Shri C.V.S.Murthy, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR /
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs on preceding day and on 12.03.2012, Rs.2 lakhs was given as loan to the assessee. The creditor is not an income tax assessee and not filing returns. During the previous year relevant to the impugned assessment year, his salary income was only Rs.11,000/- and thus there is no evidence of cash accumulation. Therefore

ITO, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. PUSARLA SUBASH, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 484/VIZ/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.472 & 473/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ A.Ys: 2007-2008 & 2010-11) Pusarla Subhash Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Prop.Sagar Durga Developers Income Tax Door No.15-13-6, Krishnanagar Range-1 Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aigpp2446K] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.474 & 475/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ A.Ys: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Pusarla Subhash Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Prop.Sagar Durga Developers Income Tax Door No.15-13-6, Krishnanagar Circle-1(1) Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aigpp2446K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.481-486/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ A.Ys: 2007-2008 To 2012-13) Income Tax Officer Vs. Pusarla Subhash Ward-1(4) Prop.Sagar Durga Developers Visakhapatnam Door No.15-13-6, Krishnanagar, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aigpp2446K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri C.V.S.Murthy, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr / Shri V.Appala Raju, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02.01.2019 25.01.2019 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Shri C.V.S.Murthy, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR /
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs on preceding day and on 12.03.2012, Rs.2 lakhs was given as loan to the assessee. The creditor is not an income tax assessee and not filing returns. During the previous year relevant to the impugned assessment year, his salary income was only Rs.11,000/- and thus there is no evidence of cash accumulation. Therefore

POOSARLA SUBHASH,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ACIT, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 473/VIZ/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.472 & 473/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ A.Ys: 2007-2008 & 2010-11) Pusarla Subhash Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Prop.Sagar Durga Developers Income Tax Door No.15-13-6, Krishnanagar Range-1 Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aigpp2446K] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.474 & 475/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ A.Ys: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Pusarla Subhash Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Prop.Sagar Durga Developers Income Tax Door No.15-13-6, Krishnanagar Circle-1(1) Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aigpp2446K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.481-486/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ A.Ys: 2007-2008 To 2012-13) Income Tax Officer Vs. Pusarla Subhash Ward-1(4) Prop.Sagar Durga Developers Visakhapatnam Door No.15-13-6, Krishnanagar, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aigpp2446K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri C.V.S.Murthy, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr / Shri V.Appala Raju, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02.01.2019 25.01.2019 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Shri C.V.S.Murthy, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR /
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs on preceding day and on 12.03.2012, Rs.2 lakhs was given as loan to the assessee. The creditor is not an income tax assessee and not filing returns. During the previous year relevant to the impugned assessment year, his salary income was only Rs.11,000/- and thus there is no evidence of cash accumulation. Therefore