BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

93 results for “disallowance”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,568Delhi2,290Kolkata892Chennai884Jaipur713Bangalore611Ahmedabad420Hyderabad360Pune290Indore245Chandigarh236Cochin175Surat168Rajkot162Raipur119Nagpur118Amritsar107Cuttack104Visakhapatnam93Guwahati69Lucknow57Allahabad53Jodhpur46Calcutta42Ranchi41Agra41Patna37Karnataka36Telangana17Jabalpur10Varanasi9Dehradun9Panaji8Kerala7SC6Orissa3Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)91Addition to Income81Section 153A54Section 143(2)53Section 271(1)(c)33Section 153C32Section 13229Disallowance29Search & Seizure

THE ASST. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. M/S. MARVEL ASSOCIATES,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 147/VIZ/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2018AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri T.Satyanandam, DRFor Respondent: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AR
Section 132Section 271ASection 40

disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act for an amount of Rs.3,35,000/- and penalty u/s 271AAB of the Act were initiated separately. During the penalty proceedings, the A.O. issued show cause notice as to why the penalty should not be levied u/s 271AAB of the Act. In reply, the assessee submitted that the assessee filed return

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

Showing 1–20 of 93 · Page 1 of 5

27
Deduction25
Cash Deposit24
Section 14723

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 168/VIZ/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowance, cash credits, estimation of undisclosed business income, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), addition towards suppression of sales and agreed

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 170/VIZ/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowance, cash credits, estimation of undisclosed business income, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), addition towards suppression of sales and agreed

MYNENI VENKATA RAO,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 130/VIZ/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowance, cash credits, estimation of undisclosed business income, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), addition towards suppression of sales and agreed

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 174/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowance, cash credits, estimation of undisclosed business income, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), addition towards suppression of sales and agreed

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 173/VIZ/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowance, cash credits, estimation of undisclosed business income, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), addition towards suppression of sales and agreed

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 172/VIZ/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowance, cash credits, estimation of undisclosed business income, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), addition towards suppression of sales and agreed

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 171/VIZ/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowance, cash credits, estimation of undisclosed business income, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), addition towards suppression of sales and agreed

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVEL,PROP: BHARATHI SOAP WORKS, 1ST LANE,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 169/VIZ/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowance, cash credits, estimation of undisclosed business income, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), addition towards suppression of sales and agreed

KOTU SARAT KUMAR,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DY.CIT., VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 493/VIZ/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: ShriG.V.N. Hari–AdvocateFor Respondent: ShriD.K. Sonawal–Sr.DR
Section 132Section 153A

disallowance is called for u/s 14A of the Act in the absence of exempt income. Accordingly, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) on this issue is set aside and this ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.‖ 5. Since the facts of the case are identical, respectfully following the view taken by the Hon’ble High Court

KOTU ANASUYA (LATE),VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 494/VIZ/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: ShriG.V.N. Hari–AdvocateFor Respondent: ShriD.K. Sonawal–Sr.DR
Section 132Section 153A

disallowance is called for u/s 14A of the Act in the absence of exempt income. Accordingly, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) on this issue is set aside and this ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.‖ 5. Since the facts of the case are identical, respectfully following the view taken by the Hon’ble High Court

DY CIT, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. KOTU SARATH KUMAR`, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 496/VIZ/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: ShriG.V.N. Hari–AdvocateFor Respondent: ShriD.K. Sonawal–Sr.DR
Section 132Section 153A

disallowance is called for u/s 14A of the Act in the absence of exempt income. Accordingly, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) on this issue is set aside and this ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.‖ 5. Since the facts of the case are identical, respectfully following the view taken by the Hon’ble High Court

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WARANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 416/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

disallowing Rs. 24,000/-, being deduction under chapter VIA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For these and such other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing Your Appellant prays that the Hon'ble Members may pass such orders deemed fit. 3. Ground Nos.1 and 2 are related to the additions made by the Assessing officer

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,, WARANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 417/VIZ/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

disallowing Rs. 24,000/-, being deduction under chapter VIA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For these and such other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing Your Appellant prays that the Hon'ble Members may pass such orders deemed fit. 3. Ground Nos.1 and 2 are related to the additions made by the Assessing officer

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 418/VIZ/2017[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

disallowing Rs. 24,000/-, being deduction under chapter VIA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For these and such other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing Your Appellant prays that the Hon'ble Members may pass such orders deemed fit. 3. Ground Nos.1 and 2 are related to the additions made by the Assessing officer

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,, WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 419/VIZ/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

disallowing Rs. 24,000/-, being deduction under chapter VIA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For these and such other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing Your Appellant prays that the Hon'ble Members may pass such orders deemed fit. 3. Ground Nos.1 and 2 are related to the additions made by the Assessing officer

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 420/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

disallowing Rs. 24,000/-, being deduction under chapter VIA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For these and such other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing Your Appellant prays that the Hon'ble Members may pass such orders deemed fit. 3. Ground Nos.1 and 2 are related to the additions made by the Assessing officer

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WARANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 414/VIZ/2017[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

disallowing Rs. 24,000/-, being deduction under chapter VIA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For these and such other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing Your Appellant prays that the Hon'ble Members may pass such orders deemed fit. 3. Ground Nos.1 and 2 are related to the additions made by the Assessing officer

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WARANGAL vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 415/VIZ/2017[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

disallowing Rs. 24,000/-, being deduction under chapter VIA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For these and such other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing Your Appellant prays that the Hon'ble Members may pass such orders deemed fit. 3. Ground Nos.1 and 2 are related to the additions made by the Assessing officer

G. VENKATA KRISHNA,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ITO,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeals of the assessees for the Assessment Years 2010-

ITA 33/VIZ/2017[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 Aug 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.31& 33/Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2010-11 & 2011-12) G.Venkata Krishna Vs. Income Tax Officer Prop.Ghantasala Manikyala Rao Cards Ward-1 11-25-167, Main Road, One Town Vijayawada Vijayawada [Pan :Acppg1246F] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.32/Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2010-11) G.Venkata Raman Income Tax Officer Partner.Sri Dhanalakshmi Ward-1(1) Stationery Mart Vijayawada 11-54-225, Jai Hind Market Main Road, One Town, Vijayawada [Pan :Acppg1245G] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.34 & 35/Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S Sri Vijayalakshmi Stationery & Income Tax Officer Fancy Mart, D.No.11-25-167 Ward-1(1) Main Road, Vijayawada Vijayawada [Pan :Aaifs1693M] निर्धाऩिती की ओि से/ Assessee By : Shri C.Subramanyam, Ar िधजस्व की ओि से/ Revenue By : Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, Dr सुिवधई की तधिीख / Date Of Hearing : 25.07.2018 घोषणध की तधिीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10.08.2018

For Appellant: Shri C.Subramanyam, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 148

undisclosed income which was not based on any evidence or any information. Similarly, there is no evidence to establish that the printouts or extracts taken from the laptop belonged to the assessee. The AO has not recorded the statement from the part time accountant or the owner of the laptop and the said laptop was also not impounded. Having impounded