BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

51 results for “disallowance”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,593Delhi2,326Chennai935Kolkata913Jaipur623Bangalore621Ahmedabad382Hyderabad333Indore224Chandigarh180Cochin164Rajkot162Pune160Surat144Nagpur112Amritsar101Raipur98Cuttack80Guwahati64Allahabad53Lucknow53Visakhapatnam51Jodhpur46Calcutta42Patna40Agra39Ranchi38Karnataka36Telangana17Dehradun11Jabalpur10Varanasi9Kerala7Panaji7SC6Orissa3Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)46Addition to Income35Section 143(2)31Section 271(1)(c)29Section 142(1)24Section 153A22Section 10A21Section 14719Search & Seizure

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 103/VIZ/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment.” 17. It has further been held that: “On the date of the search the assessments already stood completed. Since no incriminating material was unearthed during the search, no additions could have been made

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

Showing 1–20 of 51 · Page 1 of 3

16
Section 14815
Disallowance14
Survey u/s 133A12

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 102/VIZ/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment.” 17. It has further been held that: “On the date of the search the assessments already stood completed. Since no incriminating material was unearthed during the search, no additions could have been made

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ANUMOLU TIRUPATI RAYUDU(HUF),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 100/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment.” 17. It has further been held that: “On the date of the search the assessments already stood completed. Since no incriminating material was unearthed during the search, no additions could have been made

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), VIJAYAWADA vs. KANDULA LAKSHUMMA MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, KADAPA

In the result, appeal of the revenue as well as the cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 179/VIZ/2018[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Sept 2020AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.179/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Smt.Kandula Income Tax (Exemptions) Lakshumma Memorial Vijayawada Educational Society D.No.3/429 Raja Reddy Street Kadapa [Pan :Aadas4432Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.91/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.179/Viz/2018) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2013-14) Vs. M/S Smt.Kandula Lakshumma Deputy Commissioner Of Memorial Educational Society Income Tax (Exemptions) D.No.3/429 Vijayawada Raja Reddy Street Kadapa [Pan :Aadas4432Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri B.Rama Krishna, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओ रसे / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 18.08.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21.09.2020

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri B.Rama Krishna, DR
Section 11Section 13(1)(c)

income of the assessee, denying the exemption u/s 11 of the Act. Apart from the denial of exemption, the AO also made addition of Rs.1,03,65,000/- in respect of caution deposits, Rs.7,79,514/- in respect of undisclosed bank accounts and Rs.80,62,870/- on account of disallowance

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT. LTD., GUNTUR

ITA 231/VIZ/2025[2022]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Sept 2025
Section 132Section 133ASection 147Section 148

undisclosed income relating to the\npurchases in 25% of the total purchases. The said decision was confirmed\nby this Court as well on consideration of the matter, we find that the facts o\nof the present case are identical to those of M/S. Indian Woollen Carper\nFactory (Supra) at Vijay Proteins Ltd. ((Supra)) In the present case the\nTribunal

THE ETIKOPPAKA COOP AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 260/VIZ/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Mar 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Pandi, Sr.DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance could be made in view of the provisions of Section 43B as amended by Finance Act, 2003. 6. In the present case, the assessee had remitted the employees contribution beyond the due date for payment, but within the due date for filing the return of income. Hence, following the above said decisions, we find no reason to differ with

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT. LTD., GUNTUR

ITA 230/VIZ/2025[2021]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Sept 2025
Section 132Section 133ASection 147Section 148

undisclosed income relating to the\npurchases in 25% of the total purchases. The said decision was confirmed\nby this Court as well on consideration of the matter, we find that the facts o\nof the present case are identical to those of M/S. Indian Woollen Carper\nFactory (Supra) at Vijay Proteins Ltd. ((Supra)) In the present case the\nTribunal

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 574/VIZ/2019[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Nov 2020AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 1O

disallowance applying Rule 8D, hence, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld.CIT(A) and the same is upheld. The appeals of the assessee on this ground is dismissed. 12. The next issue for the A.Y.2011-12 is the addition of Rs.8,93,19,016/- representing the opening balance of the advances received by the assessee

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. FIRST TEK PVT.LTD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 608/VIZ/2019[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Nov 2020AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of .11.2020 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 1O

disallowance applying Rule 8D, hence, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld.CIT(A) and the same is upheld. The appeals of the assessee on this ground is dismissed. 12. The next issue for the A.Y.2011-12 is the addition of Rs.8,93,19,016/- representing the opening balance of the advances received by the assessee

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 609/VIZ/2019[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Nov 2020AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 1O

disallowance applying Rule 8D, hence, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld.CIT(A) and the same is upheld. The appeals of the assessee on this ground is dismissed. 12. The next issue for the A.Y.2011-12 is the addition of Rs.8,93,19,016/- representing the opening balance of the advances received by the assessee

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 577/VIZ/2019[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Nov 2020AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 1O

disallowance applying Rule 8D, hence, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld.CIT(A) and the same is upheld. The appeals of the assessee on this ground is dismissed. 12. The next issue for the A.Y.2011-12 is the addition of Rs.8,93,19,016/- representing the opening balance of the advances received by the assessee

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 576/VIZ/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Nov 2020AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 1O

disallowance applying Rule 8D, hence, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld.CIT(A) and the same is upheld. The appeals of the assessee on this ground is dismissed. 12. The next issue for the A.Y.2011-12 is the addition of Rs.8,93,19,016/- representing the opening balance of the advances received by the assessee

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. FIRST TEK PVT.LTD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 607/VIZ/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Nov 2020AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of .11.2020 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 1O

disallowance applying Rule 8D, hence, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld.CIT(A) and the same is upheld. The appeals of the assessee on this ground is dismissed. 12. The next issue for the A.Y.2011-12 is the addition of Rs.8,93,19,016/- representing the opening balance of the advances received by the assessee

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 575/VIZ/2019[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Nov 2020AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 1O

disallowance applying Rule 8D, hence, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld.CIT(A) and the same is upheld. The appeals of the assessee on this ground is dismissed. 12. The next issue for the A.Y.2011-12 is the addition of Rs.8,93,19,016/- representing the opening balance of the advances received by the assessee

LAKSHMIVARAPRASADA SURENDRANATH SAI MEKA,KRISHNA DISTRICT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, MACHILIPATNAM, MACHILIPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

ITA 99/VIZ/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Sept 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.99/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16) Lakshmi Varaprasada Vs. Income Tax Officer, Surendranath Sai Meka, Ward-1, D.No. 3-61, Kosuru, Parasupet, Machilipatnam, Kosuru Post, Movva Mandalam, Krishna District, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh-521002. Andhra Pradesh – 521150. Pan: Acbpm5900G (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Cr Hemanth Kumar, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 25/09/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of : 30/09/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

For Appellant: Sri CR Hemanth Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

undisclosed income of the assessee and made addition and determined the assessed income of the assessee at Rs. 25,19,162/- and passed the assessment order dated 30/11/2017. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC. 4. On appeal, since there was no response from the assessee with respect

MEKA RANGANAYAKAMMA,KRISHNA DISTRICT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 119/VIZ/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam22 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. AR
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 50CSection 50GSection 54G

disallowed the excess cost of construction & deduction U/s. 50G of the Act. Accordingly, the Ld. AO passed the assessment order on 10/12/2018 determining the total income at Rs. 15,63,290/-. Further, penalty proceedings U/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act were also initiated for concealment of income. Against the addition made by the Ld. AO, the assessee preferred

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. MANCHUKONDA SHYAM, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the revenue as well as the cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 87/VIZ/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam22 Sept 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.87/Viz/2020 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2016-17) Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Shri Manchukonda Shyam Income Tax Prop : Manchukonda Shyam Central Circle-1 Zaveri, D.No.10-1-27, Visakhapatnam Near Sampath Vinayaka Temple Asilmetta Visakhapatnam [Pan : Afqpm0217A] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.14/Viz/2020 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.87/Viz/2020) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2016-17) Shri Manchukonda Shyam Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Prop : Manchukonda Shyam Income Tax Zaveri, D.No.10-1-27, Central Circle-1 Near Sampath Vinayaka Temple Visakhapatnam Asilmetta, Visakhapatnam [Pan : Afqpm0217A] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 21.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of : 23.09.2020 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 132(4)

undisclosed income in the hands of the assessee and added back to the income of the assessee. 3. Against the order of the AO, the assessee went on appeal before the CIT(A) and argued that the AO made the addition purely on guess work and on the basis of third party statement without giving opportunity of cross examining

THE VIJAYAWADA ELECTRICITY EMPLOYEES CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE WARD 2(1) , VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 273/VIZ/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam22 Dec 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.273/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18) The Vijayawada Electricity Employees Vs. Income Tax Officer Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd. Ward-2 (1) Office Of The Assistant Engineer Vijayawada Operation, Kg Market Section Beside Vmc Building Apcpdcl, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaeat3589Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P.Srinivasa Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madhkar Aves, Sr.AR
Section 139(11)Section 142Section 142(1)Section 142(2)Section 144Section 69ASection 80P

disallowance made by the AO and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld.CIT(A), the assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal by raising the following grounds : 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in dismissing ground No.2 without

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT LTD, GUNTUR

ITA 228/VIZ/2025[2019]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Sept 2025
Section 132Section 133ASection 147Section 148

undisclosed income relating to the\npurchases in 25% of the total purchases. The said decision was confirmed\nby this Court as well on consideration of the matter, we find that the facts o\nof the present case are identical to those of M/S. Indian Woollen Carper\nFactory (Supra) at Vijay Proteins Ltd. ((Supra)) In the present case the\nTribunal

ASHOK KUMAR AGRAWAL,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 136/VIZ/2025[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam13 Jun 2025AY 2006-07
Section 127Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

Income-tax Act, 1961\nUnexplained moneys (Share dealings) - High Court by impugned order\nheld that where Assessing Officer disallowed exemption claimed by\nassessee under section 10(38) and made additions, alleging involvement in\npenny stock which were being misused for providing bogus accomodation\nof LTCG, however, there was lack of adverse comments from stock\nexchange and officials of company involved