M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

disallowed the same since the payment made to LIC of India towards group gratuity scheme is not covered by section 36(1)(v), 40A(7

THE ACIT,, ELURU vs. M/S. THE DISTRICT CO - OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

disallowed the same since the payment made to LIC of India towards group gratuity scheme is not covered by section 36(1)(v), 40A(7

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

disallowed the same since the payment made to LIC of India towards group gratuity scheme is not covered by section 36(1)(v), 40A(7

THE ACIT., CIRCLE - 1, ELURU, ELURU vs. M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

disallowed the same since the payment made to LIC of India towards group gratuity scheme is not covered by section 36(1)(v), 40A(7

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

disallowed the same since the payment made to LIC of India towards group gratuity scheme is not covered by section 36(1)(v), 40A(7

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

7) of section 72AB, the accumulated losses would have been entitled to carry forward and set off under the provisions of section 72. Similar is the case with the unabsorbed depreciation. Therefore, the main condition which needs to be fulfilled is that the said loss should have been allowable in the hands of R.C.Puram & Ongole Co-op. Bank

THE VISAKHAPATNAM CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

7) of section 72AB, the accumulated losses would have been entitled to carry forward and set off under the provisions of section 72. Similar is the case with the unabsorbed depreciation. Therefore, the main condition which needs to be fulfilled is that the said loss should have been allowable in the hands of R.C.Puram & Ongole Co-op. Bank

THE VISAKHAPATNAM CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

7) of section 72AB, the accumulated losses would have been entitled to carry forward and set off under the provisions of section 72. Similar is the case with the unabsorbed depreciation. Therefore, the main condition which needs to be fulfilled is that the said loss should have been allowable in the hands of R.C.Puram & Ongole Co-op. Bank

RP TRANSPORTERS, ,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), , VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

disallowing a sum of Rs.37,47,835/- being the payment made towards hire charges to contractors where the conditions laid down as per provisions of section 194C(7

KOTU ANASUYA (LATE),VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

disallowed under section 57(iii) of the Act. The gist of the observations of the AO are as follows:- ―1. The assessee is not eligible to claim expenditure u/s 57(iii) of the Act as he is not offering any income. 2. The assessee has not brought on record any evidence in support of his shown that the investments made

KOTU SARAT KUMAR,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DY.CIT., VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

disallowed under section 57(iii) of the Act. The gist of the observations of the AO are as follows:- ―1. The assessee is not eligible to claim expenditure u/s 57(iii) of the Act as he is not offering any income. 2. The assessee has not brought on record any evidence in support of his shown that the investments made

DY CIT, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. KOTU SARATH KUMAR`, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

disallowed under section 57(iii) of the Act. The gist of the observations of the AO are as follows:- ―1. The assessee is not eligible to claim expenditure u/s 57(iii) of the Act as he is not offering any income. 2. The assessee has not brought on record any evidence in support of his shown that the investments made

THE KANAKAMAHALAKSHMI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

Disallowance under s. 40A(7) - Gratuity – Actual payment of funds to LIC and not mere provision - Not hit by s. 40A(7) - CIT vs Gujarat Machine Tools (ITA 666/A hd/1985) followed". Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs Bitoni Lamps Ltd. 144 Taxman 33 held that "Section

THE KANAKAMAHALAKSHMI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

Disallowance under s. 40A(7) - Gratuity – Actual payment of funds to LIC and not mere provision - Not hit by s. 40A(7) - CIT vs Gujarat Machine Tools (ITA 666/A hd/1985) followed". Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs Bitoni Lamps Ltd. 144 Taxman 33 held that "Section

GMEDAPADU PACS,EAST GODAVARI vs. ITO, WARD-1, KAKINADA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.573/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2018-19) Gmedapadu Pacs, Vs. Income Tax Officer, East Godavari District, Ward-1, Andhra Pradesh. Kakinada. Pan: Aaaag8455A (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Sri Kss Sarma, Ca रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 16/10/2025 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 19/11/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, J.M: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Society Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, Dated 18/08/2025, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (For Short, “The Act”), Dated 10/02/2021 For Ay 2018-19. The Assessee Society Has Assailed The Impugned Order Passed By The Ao On The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

section 80P and raises a tax demand. According to the appellant, this contradiction between the narrative in the order and the figures in the computation sheet is erroneous and creates an unjust tax burden on the assessee. It is submitted that such an action is without basis and not supported by any explanation or reasoning in the assessment order. This

MOTHER THERESSA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,AMALAPURAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

disallowance on which no tax is payable by the assessee. Further as argued by the Ld.AR, the assessee has not under-reported his income as per section 270A sub-section (2) clause (a) to clause (g). Further sub-section (7

ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA vs. MOTHER THERESSA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, CHAITANYANAGAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

disallowance on which no tax is payable by the assessee. Further as argued by the Ld.AR, the assessee has not under-reported his income as per section 270A sub-section (2) clause (a) to clause (g). Further sub-section (7

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

7. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding only 25% of Rs 5,04,336/-, without appreciating the fact that the assessee company could not produce any evidence to prove the same is genuine. The Ld CIT(A) ought to have upheld the entire disallowance of Rs 5,04,336/-, without restricting the disallowance