BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “disallowance”+ Section 690clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai499Delhi408Chennai180Kolkata122Bangalore100Ahmedabad92Hyderabad64Pune52Jaipur50Surat44Lucknow26Indore22Chandigarh22Cochin15Visakhapatnam12Cuttack12Raipur10Guwahati10Rajkot9Karnataka8Ranchi6Agra6Jodhpur5Amritsar4Varanasi3SC3Nagpur2Allahabad1Patna1Jabalpur1Himachal Pradesh1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 26315Section 143(3)14Section 13(1)(c)6Section 142(1)6Section 1485Section 194H5Addition to Income5Revision u/s 2635Section 271(1)(c)

CH RAMA RAO ,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 345/VIZ/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble Vice- & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.344 & 345/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2015-16 2016-17) Ch Rama Rao V. Income Tax Officer - Ward – 3(4) C.R. Building 4-99, Ramavarappadu Vijayawada- 520002 Vijayawada – 521108 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aacfc0545L] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

690/- from the business of running a petrol bunk. The assessment was reopened by issuing notice under section 148 of the Act and accordingly statutory notice under section 142(1) of the Act was issued and served on the assessee. During the re-assessment proceedings, Ld. Assessing Officer Page No. 2 I.T.A.Nos.344 & 345/VIZ/2024 CH Rama Rao [hereinafter in short

4
Section 133A4
Survey u/s 133A4
Disallowance3

VAKA GHANTA NAGESWARARAO,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, TENALI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 251/VIZ/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.251/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2015-16) Vs. Income Tax Officer-Ward – 1 Vaka Ghanta Nageswararao 4-82-A, Gullapalli Tenali -522201 Goudapalem, Cherukapalli Mandal Andhra Pradesh Guntur – 522309 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Afjpn4315H] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri Malladi Muralidhar, Ca करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr.Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)Section 250(6)Section 69ASection 80C

690/- on 05.05.2022. The case was later transferred to the Faceless Assessment Unit and thereafter notice under section 143(2) of the Act dated 19.06.2023 and notice under section 142(1) of the Act dated 21.06.2023 was issued and served on the assessee calling for details. Since the assessee did not comply with the notice, reminder letter dated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS),, VIJAYAWADA vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL TRUST,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 313/VIZ/2018[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Jun 2020AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Dr. C.P. Rama Swami, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.R.S. Narayan, CIT DR
Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(3)Section 164(2)

disallowance of expenditure made by the AO thereby granting relief of Rs. 1,14,08,663/- 4) ld. CIT(A) erred in facts & in law in deleting additions made by the AO towards advancing loans to the staff as welfare measure of Rs. 2,85,000/-, vehicle loans of Rs. 57,844/- building security deposit

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS),, VIJAYAWADA vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL TRUST,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 312/VIZ/2018[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Jun 2020AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Dr. C.P. Rama Swami, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.R.S. Narayan, CIT DR
Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(3)Section 164(2)

disallowance of expenditure made by the AO thereby granting relief of Rs. 1,14,08,663/- 4) ld. CIT(A) erred in facts & in law in deleting additions made by the AO towards advancing loans to the staff as welfare measure of Rs. 2,85,000/-, vehicle loans of Rs. 57,844/- building security deposit

NADIMPALLY VENKATA SANKAR RAMA KRISHNAM RAJU,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 322/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Apr 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 263Section 40

690/- and deriving from business and income from other sources. The assessee is carrying on business as recovery agent for banks and financial corporations under the name Malvika Marketing & Financial Services. The assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as 'the Act') was completed in the case of the assessee on 16.04.2010 on total income

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 505/VIZ/2016[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

section 263. The appeals should have been filed before ITAT on or before 08.06.2012 against the date of filing the appeal on 21.08.2012. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay during the appeal hearing and filed the petition for condoning the delay. After hearing both the parties, the delay of 74 days is condoned and the appeals are admitted

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 506/VIZ/2016[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

section 263. The appeals should have been filed before ITAT on or before 08.06.2012 against the date of filing the appeal on 21.08.2012. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay during the appeal hearing and filed the petition for condoning the delay. After hearing both the parties, the delay of 74 days is condoned and the appeals are admitted

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 507/VIZ/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

section 263. The appeals should have been filed before ITAT on or before 08.06.2012 against the date of filing the appeal on 21.08.2012. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay during the appeal hearing and filed the petition for condoning the delay. After hearing both the parties, the delay of 74 days is condoned and the appeals are admitted

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 508/VIZ/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

section 263. The appeals should have been filed before ITAT on or before 08.06.2012 against the date of filing the appeal on 21.08.2012. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay during the appeal hearing and filed the petition for condoning the delay. After hearing both the parties, the delay of 74 days is condoned and the appeals are admitted

GRANDHI SRI VENKATA AMARENDRA,ELURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result appeals of the assessee for the assessment year 2013-14

ITA 24/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Aug 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.23 & 24/Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2013-14 & 2014-15) Sri Grandhi Sri Venkata Amarendra Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of C/O Vaibhav Jewllers Income Tax, Main Road Central Circle-1 Eluru Visakhapatnam [Pan : Abipa7175R] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.50/Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. Sri Grandhi Sri Venkata Income Tax, Amarendra Central Circle-1 C/O Vaibhav Jewellers Visakhapatnam Main Road Eluru [Pan : Abipa7175R] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩिती की ओि से/ Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar िधजस्व की ओि से/ Revenue By : Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, Dr सुिवधई की तधिीख / Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2018 घोषणध की तधिीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21 .08.2018

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DR
Section 68

section 2(23) of Indian Stamp Act, 1999, but no such acknowledgement was obtained by the assessee. Most of the vouchers were not verified by the responsible person such as accountant, manager etc. and the addresses of the goldsmiths were not furnished. The AO was of the view that the assessee was unable to prove the expenditure with the credible

GRANDHI SRI VENKATA AMARENDRA,ELURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result appeals of the assessee for the assessment year 2013-14

ITA 23/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.23 & 24/Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2013-14 & 2014-15) Sri Grandhi Sri Venkata Amarendra Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of C/O Vaibhav Jewllers Income Tax, Main Road Central Circle-1 Eluru Visakhapatnam [Pan : Abipa7175R] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.50/Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. Sri Grandhi Sri Venkata Income Tax, Amarendra Central Circle-1 C/O Vaibhav Jewellers Visakhapatnam Main Road Eluru [Pan : Abipa7175R] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩिती की ओि से/ Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar िधजस्व की ओि से/ Revenue By : Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, Dr सुिवधई की तधिीख / Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2018 घोषणध की तधिीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21 .08.2018

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DR
Section 68

section 2(23) of Indian Stamp Act, 1999, but no such acknowledgement was obtained by the assessee. Most of the vouchers were not verified by the responsible person such as accountant, manager etc. and the addresses of the goldsmiths were not furnished. The AO was of the view that the assessee was unable to prove the expenditure with the credible

M/S. PHARMA BIO SOLUTIONS,,CHINNAVUTAPALLI vs. THE, CIT(A),, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 114/VIZ/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.114/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2011-2012) M/S Pharma Bio Solutions Vs. Income Tax Officer (Formerly Named As Ward-1(2) M/S Padmaja Laboratories Vijayawada Chinnavutapalli [Pan:Aakfp5523D] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. B.V.S. Chalapathi Rao, Ar प्रत्यार्थी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Smt. Suman Malik, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 13.11.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.11.2018

For Appellant: Shri. B.V.S. Chalapathi Rao, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik, DR
Section 40Section 40A(3)

690(1998) (b) High Court of Punjab & Haryana in the case of CIT Vs. Avatar Singh & Sons 194 ITR 80 (1992) (P&H) The first appellate authority has considered the submissions of the assessee and called for the remand report and given an opportunity to the assessee to explain the reasons for payment in cash. After considering the remand report