BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai532Delhi424Chennai140Bangalore136Jaipur110Chandigarh107Hyderabad86Kolkata84Ahmedabad62Indore60Cuttack52Amritsar44Jodhpur41Pune33Allahabad26Raipur14Cochin13Rajkot12Surat9Visakhapatnam9Varanasi8Lucknow8Agra5Guwahati5Calcutta3Dehradun3Nagpur3Ranchi3Telangana2Punjab & Haryana2SC2Karnataka2Panaji1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)10Section 10A6Disallowance5Addition to Income5Section 143(2)4Section 1484Section 683Section 36(1)(va)3Section 143(1)

DEPUTY COMMSSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 103/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.100/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Visakhapatnamportauthority Vs. Theasst.Cit -Circle-1(1) Administrative Office Building 4 Th Floor, Prathyakshkar Bhavan Port Area, Visakhapatnam 530001 Mvp Road, Beside Post Office Andhra Pradesh-530001. Sector-8, Mvp Colony Visakhapatnam – 530017 [Pan:Aaalv0035C] Andhrapradesh (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.103/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) The Dy.Cit Vs. Visakhapatnamportauthority Room No. 412, 4 Th Floor Administrative Office Building Prathyakshkar Bhavan Port Area, Visakhapatnam 530035 Mvp Double Road Andhra Pradesh Opp. Rythubazar Visakhapatnam – 530014 [Pan:Aaalv0035C] Andhrapradesh (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr.Satyasai Rath, Cit(Dr)

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)

section 143(3) of the Act by making the following additions / disallowances: Sl Amount Nature of addition / disallowance No (Rs.) 1. Upfront premium added as income 75,14,24,443 2. Disallowance of Excess claim of depreciation 18,42,68,301 3. Disallowance of provision for interest on Government 3,50,00,000 Loan for Outer harbor 4. Disallowance

3
Section 139(1)3
Deduction3
Depreciation2

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 100/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.100/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Visakhapatnamportauthority Vs. Theasst.Cit -Circle-1(1) Administrative Office Building 4 Th Floor, Prathyakshkar Bhavan Port Area, Visakhapatnam 530001 Mvp Road, Beside Post Office Andhra Pradesh-530001. Sector-8, Mvp Colony Visakhapatnam – 530017 [Pan:Aaalv0035C] Andhrapradesh (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.103/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) The Dy.Cit Vs. Visakhapatnamportauthority Room No. 412, 4 Th Floor Administrative Office Building Prathyakshkar Bhavan Port Area, Visakhapatnam 530035 Mvp Double Road Andhra Pradesh Opp. Rythubazar Visakhapatnam – 530014 [Pan:Aaalv0035C] Andhrapradesh (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr.Satyasai Rath, Cit(Dr)

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)

section 143(3) of the Act by making the following additions / disallowances: Sl Amount Nature of addition / disallowance No (Rs.) 1. Upfront premium added as income 75,14,24,443 2. Disallowance of Excess claim of depreciation 18,42,68,301 3. Disallowance of provision for interest on Government 3,50,00,000 Loan for Outer harbor 4. Disallowance

PEPAKAYALA VEERABHADRARAO,KAKINADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2 , KAKINADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 259/VIZ/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अऩीऱ सं./I.T.A.No.259/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) Pepakayala Veerabhadrarao Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.68-10-20/B, Vidyut Nagar Ward-2 Kakinada Kakinada East Godavari Dist. [Pan : Akxpp4235H] (अपीऱार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P.Prabhakara Murthy, ARFor Respondent: Shri SPG Mudaliar, DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of IT. Act, is not correct both on the facts and law applicable to the facts of appellant's case. 2. In the facts and circumstances of appellants case, the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) is erred in upholding the disallowance of Rs 4,20427/- (employees share of provident fund contribution Rs 3,22,269

THE DCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. AKSHAYA GOLD FARMS & VILLAS INDIA LTD.,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 381/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam12 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonawal– CIT DR

disallowed as revenue expenses. For the sake of convenience, the relevant portion of the ld. CIT(A)’s order is extracted as under:- “I have considered the submissions made. I have also perused some sample agreements entered by the assessee with customers. It is seen that the assessee has floated several schemes for sale of plots, under which amounts have

THE DCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. AKSHAYA GOLD FARMS & VILLAS INDIA LTD.,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 380/VIZ/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam12 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonawal– CIT DR

disallowed as revenue expenses. For the sake of convenience, the relevant portion of the ld. CIT(A)’s order is extracted as under:- “I have considered the submissions made. I have also perused some sample agreements entered by the assessee with customers. It is seen that the assessee has floated several schemes for sale of plots, under which amounts have

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. MINIMET REFRACORY SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the revenue as well as the cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 476/VIZ/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.476/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year:2009-10) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Minimet Refractory Income Tax Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Circle-3(1) (Formerly Known As Almag Visakhapatnam Marketting (India) Pvt. Ltd.) 101-B, Sri Venkateswara Towers, 5Th Lane, Dwaraka Nagar Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aafca5872N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.134/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.476/Viz/2018) (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year:2009-10) M/S Minimet Refractory Solutions Asst.Commissioner Of Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax (Formerly Known As Almag Marketting Circle-3(1) (India) Pvt. Ltd.) Visakhapatnam 101-B, Sri Venkateswara Towers, 5Th Lane, Dwaraka Nagar Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aafca5872N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 10ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

269/- as against the originally determined income of Rs.40,14,900/-. 2.1. In the reassessment proceedings, from the Schedule –I, pertains to sales forming part of profit and loss account the AO found that the assessee had admitted the total turnover of the business at Rs.30,18,95,670/- and export sales of Rs.20,05,69,300/-. Since profit

PENMATSA RAMA KRISHNA VARMA,BHIMAVARAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 81/VIZ/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

269/- and Rs. 95,693/- respectively, the Ld. AR did not press these grounds due to the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services Private Limited, Civil Appeal No.2833 of 2016 dated 2nd October 2022. Per contra, the Ld. DR relied on the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities. 7. We have heard

ROBBI SRINIVASA RAO.,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE PR,. CIT,-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 284/VIZ/2017[2102-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 Aug 2018AY 2102-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blerobbi Srinivasa Rao, Vs. Pr.Cit-1, D.No. 49-50-7/10, Srinivasa Visakhapatnam. Towers, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Adspr 1884 N (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonawal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40A(3)

section 40A(3) squarely applies to the assessee’s case and ld. Commissioner rightly directed the Assessing Officer to disallow the amount paid in cash of Rs. 42,10,000/- and add the same to the total income of the assessee. 8. We have heard both the sides, perused the material available on record and orders of the authorities below

FOCUS TRANS TECH SHIPPING PVT LTD,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 179/VIZ/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 179/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2019-20) Focus Transtech Shipping Private Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax Limited Circle-3(1) Flat No.402, Level 4, Waltair Heights Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aabcf3074H] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri I.Kamasastry, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Spg Mudaliar, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 03.02.2022 16.02.2022 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

For Appellant: Shri I.Kamasastry, ARFor Respondent: Shri SPG Mudaliar, DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

section 139(1) of the income-tax Act, 1961. 3. The Central Processing Centre is not justified in making an addition of Rs.1,06,269/- on the ground that the nature of business mentioned by the assessee is other than power sector. Whereas this amount is profit on sale of a vehicle which is credited to Profit and Loss Account