PENMATSA RAMA KRISHNA VARMA,BHIMAVARAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that delayed payment of employee PF/ESI contributions are disallowable as per the Supreme Court's decision in Checkmate Services. However, the receipt of SBNs as professional fees during demonetization was not illegal and therefore not taxable under Section 68.
What were the facts?
The assessee received employee contributions for PF and ESI late, and also deposited cash in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) during demonetization. The Assessing Officer disallowed the late PF/ESI contributions and added the SBN deposits to income under Section 68.
What were the issues?
Whether delayed deposit of employee's PF/ESI contributions are disallowable, and if cash deposits in SBNs during demonetization are taxable as unexplained income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 68,Section 43B,Section 36(1)(va),Section 115BBE
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
PER S. BALAKRISHNAN, Accountant Member :
This appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] in DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/50/2021- 22/1041153996(1), dated 21/3/2022 arising out of the order passed U/s. 143(3) of the Act for the AY 2017-18. 2
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual
and proprietor of Varm
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026