GANGUNAIDU SABBAVARAPU,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(5), VISAKHPATNAM

1, the Supreme Court observed at Page 694 as under :- "The above observations do not rule out a case for raising an additional ground before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner if the ground so raised could not have been raised at that particular stage when the return was filed or when the assessment order was made, or that the ground became

ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

section shall be allowed for any assessment year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2018, ie., for AY 2018-19 and onwards. In the present case, the appellant has claimed CSR expenses under the aforementioned Rule, which is not applicable for AY 2020-21. So in view of the aforesaid facts I am not in a position

ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

section shall be allowed for any assessment year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2018, ie., for AY 2018-19 and onwards. In the present case, the appellant has claimed CSR expenses under the aforementioned Rule, which is not applicable for AY 2020-21. So in view of the aforesaid facts I am not in a position

ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

section shall be allowed for any assessment year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2018, ie., for AY 2018-19 and onwards. In the present case, the appellant has claimed CSR expenses under the aforementioned Rule, which is not applicable for AY 2020-21. So in view of the aforesaid facts I am not in a position

ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

section shall be allowed for any assessment year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2018, ie., for AY 2018-19 and onwards. In the present case, the appellant has claimed CSR expenses under the aforementioned Rule, which is not applicable for AY 2020-21. So in view of the aforesaid facts I am not in a position

ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

section shall be allowed for any assessment year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2018, ie., for AY 2018-19 and onwards. In the present case, the appellant has claimed CSR expenses under the aforementioned Rule, which is not applicable for AY 2020-21. So in view of the aforesaid facts I am not in a position

ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

section shall be allowed for any assessment year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2018, ie., for AY 2018-19 and onwards. In the present case, the appellant has claimed CSR expenses under the aforementioned Rule, which is not applicable for AY 2020-21. So in view of the aforesaid facts I am not in a position

ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PVT. LTD,, RAJAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

disallowed u/s.37(1) of the Act, and, in this regard, reliance was placed on the decision of Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal in the case of Hansraj Mathurdas vs. ITO (ITA No.2397/M/2010). It was further contended that even if there is no employer - employee relationship, such payments are allowed as deduction on the basis of commercial considerations. It was submitted that

SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PVT. LTD.,,RAJAM vs. THE ITO,, SRIKAKULAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

disallowed u/s.37(1) of the Act, and, in this regard, reliance was placed on the decision of Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal in the case of Hansraj Mathurdas vs. ITO (ITA No.2397/M/2010). It was further contended that even if there is no employer - employee relationship, such payments are allowed as deduction on the basis of commercial considerations. It was submitted that

SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED,,RAJAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

disallowed u/s.37(1) of the Act, and, in this regard, reliance was placed on the decision of Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal in the case of Hansraj Mathurdas vs. ITO (ITA No.2397/M/2010). It was further contended that even if there is no employer - employee relationship, such payments are allowed as deduction on the basis of commercial considerations. It was submitted that

THE DCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE MILLS PVT LTD,, SRIKAKULAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

disallowed u/s.37(1) of the Act, and, in this regard, reliance was placed on the decision of Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal in the case of Hansraj Mathurdas vs. ITO (ITA No.2397/M/2010). It was further contended that even if there is no employer - employee relationship, such payments are allowed as deduction on the basis of commercial considerations. It was submitted that

VAKA GHANTA NAGESWARARAO,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, TENALI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.251/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2015-16) Vs. Income Tax Officer-Ward – 1 Vaka Ghanta Nageswararao 4-82-A, Gullapalli Tenali -522201 Goudapalem, Cherukapalli Mandal Andhra Pradesh Guntur – 522309 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Afjpn4315H] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri Malladi Muralidhar, Ca करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr.Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

disallowed an amount of Rs.1,85,500/- being claim made by the assessee towards interest on borrowed capital and deduction claimed u/s. 80C of the Act. 3. On being aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, assessee filed an appeal before Ld. CIT(A). Ld. CIT(A) after carefully examining the submissions made by the assessee, dismissed the appeal

UNITED FREIGHT CARRIERS PRIVATE LIMITED,VISAKHAPATANAM vs. DCIT CIRCLE-4(1), VISAKHAPATANAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.74/Viz/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2018-19) United Freight Carriers Private Limited V. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Flat No.205, Vinayaka Paradise Circle-5(1) Near Srinagar Bus Stop, Srinagar Visakhapatnam Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam - 530 026 Andhra Pradesh

254(2) of the Act is beyond and much larger than scope of review as given in the Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC. Ld.AR therefore pleaded that, belated payments of employee’s contribution of PF and ESI may be allowed. 7. Per contra, Ld. Departmental Representative [hereinafter in short “Ld. DR”] fully supported the intimation under section 143(1

SRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KAKINADA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.598/Viz/2018 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2009-10) M/S Sri Chaitanya Educational Society Vs. Acit Chaitanya Nagar Central Circle-1 Kakinada Rajahmundry [Pan :Aabas4398D] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri C.Subrahmanyam, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri P.Srinivasa Murthy, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.07.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21.08.2019 आदेश /O R D E R

disallowed the interest paid to Sri Koundinya Educational Society, though the assessee has filed the relevant information before the AO. In the consequential order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254, the AO held that proviso to section 40(a)(ia) came into force w.e.f. 01.04.2013 and impugned assessment year was 2009-10 and the proviso has no application in case

GVR POWER & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,KADIYAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1), RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

section 254 of the Income tax Act, 1961. There shall be no order as to costs. From the above precedent, we find that Hon’ble Supreme court has prohibited the Assessing Officer to entertain any claim/deduction of the assessee otherwise than claiming in the return/revised return. However, this restriction was not imposed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case

ITO, WARD-3(3),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SIRIPURAPU CHINATALLI,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.375/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2008-09) Income Tax Officer Vs. Smt.Siripurapu Chinatalli Ward-3(3) D.No.9-16-37/2 Visakhapatnam Gurajada Enclave Cbm Compound Visakhapatnam [Pan : Agrpc1150E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.457/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2008-09) Income Tax Officer Vs. Shri K.V.V.Prasad Ward-3(3) Plot No.301, Vytla Residency Visakhapatnam Balajinagar Siripuram Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr प्रत्यधथी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 24.01.2019 : 13.02.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement

254 (Mumbai) In the case referred above the coordinate bench of ITAT held as under: “Therefore, it would be clear that the penalty proceedings are distinct from the assessment proceedings and, hence, it becomes amply clear that any addition made does not automatically lead to the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c). In the penalty proceedings, the assessee

ITO, WARD-3(3),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SHRI K V V PRASAD,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.375/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2008-09) Income Tax Officer Vs. Smt.Siripurapu Chinatalli Ward-3(3) D.No.9-16-37/2 Visakhapatnam Gurajada Enclave Cbm Compound Visakhapatnam [Pan : Agrpc1150E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.457/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2008-09) Income Tax Officer Vs. Shri K.V.V.Prasad Ward-3(3) Plot No.301, Vytla Residency Visakhapatnam Balajinagar Siripuram Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr प्रत्यधथी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 24.01.2019 : 13.02.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement

254 (Mumbai) In the case referred above the coordinate bench of ITAT held as under: “Therefore, it would be clear that the penalty proceedings are distinct from the assessment proceedings and, hence, it becomes amply clear that any addition made does not automatically lead to the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c). In the penalty proceedings, the assessee

THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ANDHRA PRADESH PAPER MILLS LTD.,, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed and the cross objections filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

254)] held that any positive or negative effect on the cost of the asset purchased has to be adjusted only at the time of making actual payment. Therefore, directed the Assessing Officer to verify the dates of payments and then apply section 43A. 22 Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the Revenue is in appeal before this

THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ANDHRA PRADESH PAPER MILLS LTD.,, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed and the cross objections filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

254)] held that any positive or negative effect on the cost of the asset purchased has to be adjusted only at the time of making actual payment. Therefore, directed the Assessing Officer to verify the dates of payments and then apply section 43A. 22 Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the Revenue is in appeal before this