BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

21 results for “disallowance”+ Section 234Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,657Delhi1,571Bangalore1,025Ahmedabad328Kolkata210Jaipur183Chennai178Pune158Hyderabad149Indore71Nagpur63Chandigarh56Surat48Allahabad39Ranchi37Agra35Rajkot34Lucknow31Visakhapatnam21Karnataka20Dehradun18Jodhpur18Raipur15Cochin12Cuttack11Patna11Amritsar11Jabalpur5SC5Panaji3Guwahati2Telangana1Varanasi1Calcutta1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 14825Section 143(3)20Section 80I15Section 133A14Section 36(1)(v)14Section 40A(7)(b)14Deduction14Section 4013Section 143(1)11

DCIT, CIRCLE -3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NORD ANGLIA EDUCATION INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue, viz

ITA 314/VIZ/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: 1.Shri Karnjot Singh KhuranaFor Respondent: Shri Badicala Yadagiri, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

section 14A. However relying on various decision of Hon’ble courts relied by appellant in its submission the disallowance is restricted to Rs 20,585/-. The balance disallowance is deleted. 6.5. Ground of Appeal No. 6– disallowance u/s 43B Appellant submitted that provision of gratuity and leave encashment has been disallowed in the computation of income. However, Rs 20 lacs

DCIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NORD ANGLIA EDUCATION INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue, viz

Showing 1–20 of 21 · Page 1 of 2

Addition to Income11
Disallowance10
Reopening of Assessment7
ITA 206/VIZ/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: 1.Shri Karnjot Singh KhuranaFor Respondent: Shri Badicala Yadagiri, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

section 14A. However relying on various decision of Hon’ble courts relied by appellant in its submission the disallowance is restricted to Rs 20,585/-. The balance disallowance is deleted. 6.5. Ground of Appeal No. 6– disallowance u/s 43B Appellant submitted that provision of gratuity and leave encashment has been disallowed in the computation of income. However, Rs 20 lacs

MAHATI SOFTWARE PVT LTD.,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 67/VIZ/2016[20011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Sept 2018

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.67/Viz/2016 & 68/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2011-12 & 2012-13) M/S Mahati Software Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of D.No.10-27-14A Income Tax Sivam, Kailashmetta Circle-3(1) Waltair Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aadcm9620J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 144Section 144C(1)Section 194JSection 40

section 40(a)(ia) and 36(a)(va) and the adhoc disallowance on foreign travel expenses. The appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 and 2012-13 are allowed. 25. The next issue in this appeal is charging of interest u/s 234B

M/S. MAHATI SOFTWARE PVT. LTD.,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 68/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Sept 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.67/Viz/2016 & 68/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2011-12 & 2012-13) M/S Mahati Software Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of D.No.10-27-14A Income Tax Sivam, Kailashmetta Circle-3(1) Waltair Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aadcm9620J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 144Section 144C(1)Section 194JSection 40

section 40(a)(ia) and 36(a)(va) and the adhoc disallowance on foreign travel expenses. The appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 and 2012-13 are allowed. 25. The next issue in this appeal is charging of interest u/s 234B

ARABOLU VENKATA NAGA DEEPATHI REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, N. SATYARAMANUJAMM ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal fails and the same is hereby dismissed

ITA 178/VIZ/2018[2010-2011]Status: HeardITAT Visakhapatnam28 Mar 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.178/Viz/2018 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2010-11) Smt.Arabolu Venkata Naga Deepthi Vs. Income Tax Officer Rep. By Power Of Attorney Holder (International Taxation) Smt. N.Satyaramanujam Visakhapatnam Flat No.403, Dhanna Apartments Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam [Pan : Atcpa6413A] (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri I.Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Shri SPG Mudaliar, DR
Section 143(2)Section 148Section 195Section 201(1)Section 234ASection 54Section 54F

234B and 234C and the Id. CIT (Appeals) is not correct in confirming the levy/charge of interest. 3. The above grounds are mutually exclusive and without prejudice to one another. 4. The appellant craves leave to add to, amend, alter, modify, delete all or any of the above grounds appeal. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee

GVK POWER & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,KADIYAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 553/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam03 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.553/Viz/2018 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2014-15) M/S Gvk Power & Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.5-48, Gvk Power Plant Income Tax Jegurupadu, Kadiyammandal Circle-2(1) East Godavari Rajamahendravaram [Pan :Aaacj5599A] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओ रसे/ Appellant By Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से/ Respondent By Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 21.03.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 03.04.2019

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36Section 5

disallowance was proposed to be made. Therefore, argued that the scheme of assessment u/s 144C does not permit the AO to make the additions which are not proposed in the draft assessment order. Hence, requested to delete the additions and allow the appeal of the assessee. 30. On the other hand, the Ld.DR supported the orders of the lower authorities

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 515/VIZ/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

section 40A(7) (b) (i) on account of gratuity actually deposited in fund created by it - Whether such a claim could only have been disallowed if it had been proved that gratuity, in respect of which said payment had been made, had not become payable during previous year - Held, yes - Whether in absence of such a case made

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 50/VIZ/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

section 40A(7) (b) (i) on account of gratuity actually deposited in fund created by it - Whether such a claim could only have been disallowed if it had been proved that gratuity, in respect of which said payment had been made, had not become payable during previous year - Held, yes - Whether in absence of such a case made

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 524/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

section 40A(7) (b) (i) on account of gratuity actually deposited in fund created by it - Whether such a claim could only have been disallowed if it had been proved that gratuity, in respect of which said payment had been made, had not become payable during previous year - Held, yes - Whether in absence of such a case made

THE ACIT,, ELURU vs. M/S. THE DISTRICT CO - OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 269/VIZ/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

section 40A(7) (b) (i) on account of gratuity actually deposited in fund created by it - Whether such a claim could only have been disallowed if it had been proved that gratuity, in respect of which said payment had been made, had not become payable during previous year - Held, yes - Whether in absence of such a case made

THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU vs. M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 78/VIZ/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

section 40A(7) (b) (i) on account of gratuity actually deposited in fund created by it - Whether such a claim could only have been disallowed if it had been proved that gratuity, in respect of which said payment had been made, had not become payable during previous year - Held, yes - Whether in absence of such a case made

THE ACIT., CIRCLE - 1, ELURU, ELURU vs. M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 476/VIZ/2012[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

section 40A(7) (b) (i) on account of gratuity actually deposited in fund created by it - Whether such a claim could only have been disallowed if it had been proved that gratuity, in respect of which said payment had been made, had not become payable during previous year - Held, yes - Whether in absence of such a case made

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 49/VIZ/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

section 40A(7) (b) (i) on account of gratuity actually deposited in fund created by it - Whether such a claim could only have been disallowed if it had been proved that gratuity, in respect of which said payment had been made, had not become payable during previous year - Held, yes - Whether in absence of such a case made

VENKATA SATYA LAKSHMI KANTHA RAO GRANDHI,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 93/VIZ/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Feb 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.93/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2021-22) Venkata Satya Lakshmi Kantha Rao V. Dcit, Grandhi, Circle-1(1), Guntur. Guntur. [Pan: Aatpn3851F] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 234CSection 36(1)(va)

section 36(1)(va) of the Act, the CPC is within its powers to disallow a wrong claim made by the assessee while filing the return of income which is apparent on record. Accordingly, this ground raised by the assessee is dismissed. 9. Regarding Ground No.5, the assessee has challenged the levy of interest U/s. 234A, 234B

KOLLI VENKATA MOHANA RAO, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 352/VIZ/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam03 Jun 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik, Sr.DR
Section 194CSection 234BSection 234DSection 40

234B and Rs. 4,982/- u/sec. 234D of the Act. 4. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of appeal hearing.” 5. The ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground that amendment made to section 40(a)(ia) by Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 w.e.f. 01/04/2015, the disallowance

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WRD-1, BHIMAVARAM vs. YENDANGANDHI LARGE SIZED CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 243/VIZ/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam22 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.243/Viz/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) Income Tax Officer Vs. M/S Yendagandhi Large Sized Ward-1 Co-Operative Society Ltd. Bhimavaram D.No.4-13, K.K.Road Yendagandi, West Godavari Dist [Pan : Aacat0967G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.01/Viz/2023 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.243/Viz/2022) (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) M/S Yendagandhi Large Sized Co- Income Tax Officer Operative Society Ltd. Ward-1 D.No.4-13, K.K.Road Bhimavaram Yendagandi, West Godavari Dist [Pan : Aacat0967G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar Revenue By : Shri Madhukar Aves, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing 10.10.2023 : घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22.11.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)], National Faceless

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madhukar Aves, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)

234B and Rs.4852/- u/s 234C of the Act. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) and the Ld.CIT(A), relying on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. CIT, Calicut & Ors dated 12.01.2021, allowed the appeal

SURESH KUMAR JAIN,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , VISAKHAPATNAM

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 585/VIZ/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam11 Dec 2019AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhs.A.No.69/Viz/2019 To 71/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. Nos. 585-587/Viz/2019 Respectively) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2014-15 To 2016-17 Respectively) Sri Suresh Kumar Jain Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.50-50-38/9 Income Tax Tpt Colony Central Circle-1 Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Adzpj5028K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 585/Viz/2019 To 587/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2014-15 To 2016-17 Respectively) Sri Suresh Kumar Jain Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.50-50-38/9 Income Tax Tpt Colony Central Circle-1 Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Adzpj5028K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri T.S.N.Murthy, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 18.11.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.12.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri T.S.N.Murthy, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69ASection 80I

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 80IA and accordingly made the addition. 16 S.A. No.69/Viz/2019 to 71/Viz/2019 and I.T.A Nos.585/Viz/2019 to 587/Viz/2019, A.Y.2014-15 to 2016-17 Sri Suresh Kumar Jain, Visakhapatnam 20. Against the order of the AO, the assessee went on appeal before the CIT(A) and the Ld.CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Against

SURESH KUMAR JAIN,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 587/VIZ/2019[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam11 Dec 2019AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhs.A.No.69/Viz/2019 To 71/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. Nos. 585-587/Viz/2019 Respectively) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2014-15 To 2016-17 Respectively) Sri Suresh Kumar Jain Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.50-50-38/9 Income Tax Tpt Colony Central Circle-1 Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Adzpj5028K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 585/Viz/2019 To 587/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2014-15 To 2016-17 Respectively) Sri Suresh Kumar Jain Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.50-50-38/9 Income Tax Tpt Colony Central Circle-1 Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Adzpj5028K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri T.S.N.Murthy, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 18.11.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.12.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri T.S.N.Murthy, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69ASection 80I

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 80IA and accordingly made the addition. 16 S.A. No.69/Viz/2019 to 71/Viz/2019 and I.T.A Nos.585/Viz/2019 to 587/Viz/2019, A.Y.2014-15 to 2016-17 Sri Suresh Kumar Jain, Visakhapatnam 20. Against the order of the AO, the assessee went on appeal before the CIT(A) and the Ld.CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Against

SURESH KUMAR JAIN,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 586/VIZ/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam11 Dec 2019AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhs.A.No.69/Viz/2019 To 71/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. Nos. 585-587/Viz/2019 Respectively) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2014-15 To 2016-17 Respectively) Sri Suresh Kumar Jain Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.50-50-38/9 Income Tax Tpt Colony Central Circle-1 Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Adzpj5028K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 585/Viz/2019 To 587/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2014-15 To 2016-17 Respectively) Sri Suresh Kumar Jain Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.50-50-38/9 Income Tax Tpt Colony Central Circle-1 Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Adzpj5028K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri T.S.N.Murthy, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 18.11.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.12.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri T.S.N.Murthy, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69ASection 80I

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 80IA and accordingly made the addition. 16 S.A. No.69/Viz/2019 to 71/Viz/2019 and I.T.A Nos.585/Viz/2019 to 587/Viz/2019, A.Y.2014-15 to 2016-17 Sri Suresh Kumar Jain, Visakhapatnam 20. Against the order of the AO, the assessee went on appeal before the CIT(A) and the Ld.CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Against

PARASURAM KESARI,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(4), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 189/VIZ/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam22 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. AR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

section 40A(3) of the Act aggregating to Rs. 56,57,210/- towards lorry hire charges. Therefore, the Ld. AO issued a notice U/s. 148 of the Act on 11/12/2015 which was served on 15/12/2015. In response, the assessee filed his revised return of income for the AY 2012-13 on 11/1/2016 declaring a total income