VENKATA SATYA LAKSHMI KANTHA RAO GRANDHI,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), GUNTUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the disallowance, stating that delay in depositing employee's PF/ESI contributions is not excusable without proof of timely submission to bankers, following the Supreme Court's Checkmate Services judgment. It confirmed that the CPC has the power under Section 143(1) to disallow such claims if apparent from the record, and the levy of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C is consequential.
What were the facts?
An individual assessee filed their return for AY 2021-22, and the AO added Rs. 4,59,827/- for delayed payment of employee's PF & ESI contributions. The assessee contended the delay was due to the banker's processing and the Covid-19 pandemic, despite generating challans on time. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Checkmate Services Private Limited vs. CIT.
What were the issues?
Disallowance of employee's PF/ESI contributions due to delayed payment, power of CPC to make this adjustment under Section 143(1), and consequential levy of interest.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 36(1)(va),Section 43B,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM “DIVISION” BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI LALIET KUMAR, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
आदेशकीप्रतततलतपअग्रेतषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. तििााररती/ The Assessee : Venkata Satya Lakshmi Kantha Rao Grandhi, D.No. 25-7-11, 3rd Lane, Ramanama Kshetram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh – 522004. 2. राजस्व/ The Revenue : DCIT, Circle-1(1), Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4. तवभागीयप्रतततिति, आयकरअपीलीयअतिकरण, तवशाखापटणम /DR,ITAT, Visakhapatnam 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax गार्ाफ़ाईल / Guard file 6. //True Copy// आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- R K Swamy Limited, Chennai vs DCIT Non Corporate Circle 10(1), ChennaiITA 504/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. R.K. Swamy Ltd., Chennai vs DCIT, Ncc-10(1), ChennaiITA 2822/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 838/IND/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026