Search: disallowance

91 results for “disallowance”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)86 Section 143(3)61 Addition to Income43 Penalty43 Section 14739 Section 270A38 Disallowance37 Section 14836 Section 142(1)28 Section 153A

RAMAKRISHNA AGENCIES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 30/VIZ/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Visakhapatnam13 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 30 & 31/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2017-18) Ramakrishna Agencies, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-1(1), Pan: Aajfr 3436 Q Visakhapatnam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. Ar

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. AR

Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 270A(10)Section 271B

disallowance is made on estimation basis, no penalty can be levied. Disallowance of expenditure cannot be said to be considered

Showing 1–20 of 91 · Page 1 of 5

RAMAKRISHNA AGENCIES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

RAMAKRISHNA AGENCIES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

RAMAKRISHNA AGENCIES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

KOSANAM RAMA RAO,GUNTUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), GUNTUR

CH RAMA RAO ,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), VIJAYAWADA

N R CONSTRUCTIONS,KAKINADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, KAKINADA

RAJAM POLYPACKS LIMITED,RAJAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SRIKAKULAM

THE DEPUTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. M/S. SEVEN HILLS HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD,, VISAKHAPATNAM

NALLAMILLI SATYANARAYANA REDDY & OTHERS vs. THE DY. CIT,, KAKINADA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VENKATA SITA RAMACHANDRA RAO KANCHUMARTHY, RAJAHMUNDRY

MS USHA TUBUS & PIPES PVT LTD.,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITO, WARD-3(3),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SHRI K V V PRASAD,, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITO, WARD-3(3),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SIRIPURAPU CHINATALLI,, VISAKHAPATNAM

SARADAMBIKA POWER PLANT (P) LTD, SRIKAKULAM,SRIKAKULAM vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

MOTHER THERESSA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,AMALAPURAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA vs. MOTHER THERESSA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, CHAITANYANAGAR

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU