SRI SAHASRALINGESWARA SWAMY,PONNUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS WARD, GUNTUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed mutatis mutandis for the A

Bench: The Tribunal, The Assessee Filed Appeals (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Hereinafter In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”] Vide Respective Din & Order No. As Stated Below: -

17-07- 2017 and there was no change in constitution as it belongs to Endowments Department of State Government of Andhra Pradesh. As such, the temple trust will get U/s-12A benefits for this Assessment Year also and will also get 15% accumulation benefits, to be worked out and granted while calculating income computation as per Hon'ble Supreme Court

SRI SAHASRALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), GUNTUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed mutatis mutandis for the A

Bench: The Tribunal, The Assessee Filed Appeals (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Hereinafter In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”] Vide Respective Din & Order No. As Stated Below: -

17-07- 2017 and there was no change in constitution as it belongs to Endowments Department of State Government of Andhra Pradesh. As such, the temple trust will get U/s-12A benefits for this Assessment Year also and will also get 15% accumulation benefits, to be worked out and granted while calculating income computation as per Hon'ble Supreme Court

SRI SAHASRALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE,PONNUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS WARD, GUNTUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed mutatis mutandis for the A

Bench: The Tribunal, The Assessee Filed Appeals (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Hereinafter In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”] Vide Respective Din & Order No. As Stated Below: -

17-07- 2017 and there was no change in constitution as it belongs to Endowments Department of State Government of Andhra Pradesh. As such, the temple trust will get U/s-12A benefits for this Assessment Year also and will also get 15% accumulation benefits, to be worked out and granted while calculating income computation as per Hon'ble Supreme Court

SRI SAHASRALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE,PONNUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS WARD, GUNTUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed mutatis mutandis for the A

Bench: The Tribunal, The Assessee Filed Appeals (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Hereinafter In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”] Vide Respective Din & Order No. As Stated Below: -

17-07- 2017 and there was no change in constitution as it belongs to Endowments Department of State Government of Andhra Pradesh. As such, the temple trust will get U/s-12A benefits for this Assessment Year also and will also get 15% accumulation benefits, to be worked out and granted while calculating income computation as per Hon'ble Supreme Court

BARRI NAGESWARARAO AND PALEPU RAGHAVENDRARAO MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, TURANGI,TURANGI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KAKINADA

17-3-2025 cited\nSUPRA may be SET ASIDE and the assessee -Trust may be granted RE\nREGISTRATION for all the Assessment years under review viz., A.Y. 2024-25,\n2025-26 and 2026-27 as ACCORDED in the order of PROVISIONAL\nREGISTRATION as contained in Form No.10 AC dated 29-01-2024 and the\nsame may be RESTORED AND REGULATED

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS),, VIJAYAWADA vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL TRUST,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

charitable trust and was registered u/sec. 12A of the Act. Accordingly, assessee has been claiming exemption u/sec. 11 over the years and the same was allowed by the department. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam had cancelled the registration of the trust u/sec. 12AA(3) w.e.f. 01/04/2009 vide his order dated 06/02/2013. During the course of assessment proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS),, VIJAYAWADA vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL TRUST,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

charitable trust and was registered u/sec. 12A of the Act. Accordingly, assessee has been claiming exemption u/sec. 11 over the years and the same was allowed by the department. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam had cancelled the registration of the trust u/sec. 12AA(3) w.e.f. 01/04/2009 vide his order dated 06/02/2013. During the course of assessment proceedings

WOMEN & CHILD WELFARE CENTRE,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अऩीऱ सं./ I.T.A. No.236/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year :2017-18) Women & Child Welfare Centre, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Garividi, Exemption Ward, Vizianagaram. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaatw 0407 H (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Suseel Kumar Agarwal प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Sri Spg Mudaliar, Sr. Ar सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/03/2022 घोषणध की तधरीख/Date Of : 06/04/2022 Pronouncement O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

section 11 & 12 derived during the year excluding voluntary contributions. However, the total receipts for the trust for the AY 2017-18 is Rs. 37,99,385/- (including the addition of Rs. 24,22,150/-) and the total payments applied for charitable purposes for the AY 2017-18j is Rs. 39,98,622/-j as correctly mentioned

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), EXEMPTION CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA vs. ANDHRA CRICKET ASSOCIATION, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.50/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2016-2017) Asst.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S Andhra Cricket (Exemptions) Association Exemptions Circle D.No.60-8-8, 5Th Lane Vijayawada Siddartha Nagar Vijayawada [Pan : Aaatt2377D] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri M.A.Rahim, I.T.P सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 25.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23.11.2020

17,339/- and interest of ₹ 1,26,10,435/- on FDR‟s & SB accounts. Out of these receipts, the assessee incurred expenditure towards conducting various tournaments, grants to District associations for conducting league tournaments and development of game and other heads such as Administrative & Maintenance. From the above, it is very clear that the receipts received by the assessee

DR KONDABOLU BASAVAPUNAIAH & DR LAKSHMI PRASAD TRUST,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), GUNTUR

Charitable\nTrust registered under section 12A of the Act and Section 80G of the Act.\nFor the year under consideration, the assessee filed its return of income on\n31.03.2018 declaring a total income of Rs.2,13,63,753/-. The return filed by the\nassessee was selected for scrutiny under CASS in order to verify the sale of\nshares, securities

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

Trust ensures that the scope of "education" under the Income Tax Act is broad enough to encompass non-traditional educational activities like coaching activities. Such institutions can qualify for tax exemptions as long as they fulfill the statutory requirements, namely, their income is used solely for educational purposes, they operate as non-profit entities, and they are registered under Section

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

Trust ensures that the scope of "education" under the Income Tax Act is broad enough to encompass non-traditional educational activities like coaching activities. Such institutions can qualify for tax exemptions as long as they fulfill the statutory requirements, namely, their income is used solely for educational purposes, they operate as non-profit entities, and they are registered under Section

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

Trust ensures that the scope of "education" under the Income Tax Act is broad enough to encompass non-traditional educational activities like coaching activities. Such institutions can qualify for tax exemptions as long as they fulfill the statutory requirements, namely, their income is used solely for educational purposes, they operate as non-profit entities, and they are registered under Section

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

Trust ensures that the scope of "education" under the Income Tax Act is broad enough to encompass non-traditional educational activities like coaching activities. Such institutions can qualify for tax exemptions as long as they fulfill the statutory requirements, namely, their income is used solely for educational purposes, they operate as non-profit entities, and they are registered under Section

ST. MARYS ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL SOCIETY,NARASARAOPET vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION WARD), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.484 & 485/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) St. Marys English Medium School Society V. Ito (Exemption) Income Tax Office Main Road, Ravipadu Village Lakshmipuram Main Road Narasaraopet Mandal Guntur – 522006 Narasaraopet – 522604, Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aakts3349C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

charitable Trust v. ITO (2017) 249 Taxman 0372 (Madras). c) Order of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of CIT v. Sanmac Motor Finance Ltd., (2010) 322 ITR 0309. d) Order of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of DDIT (Exemptions) v. Petroleum Sports Promotion Board [(2014) 362 ITR 0235 (Delhi

ST. MARYS ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL SOCIETY,NARASARAOPET vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION WARD), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.484 & 485/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) St. Marys English Medium School Society V. Ito (Exemption) Income Tax Office Main Road, Ravipadu Village Lakshmipuram Main Road Narasaraopet Mandal Guntur – 522006 Narasaraopet – 522604, Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aakts3349C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

charitable Trust v. ITO (2017) 249 Taxman 0372 (Madras). c) Order of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of CIT v. Sanmac Motor Finance Ltd., (2010) 322 ITR 0309. d) Order of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of DDIT (Exemptions) v. Petroleum Sports Promotion Board [(2014) 362 ITR 0235 (Delhi

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

Charitable Trust / institution. The Ld. CIT-1, Visakhapatnam observed that allowing the deduction of expenditure relating to the earlier assessment years during the AY 2010-11 amounted to grant of double benefit to the assessee and therefore the order of 10 the Ld. AO is erroneous and also prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The Ld. CIT-1, Visakhapatnam

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ADDL. CIT.,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

Charitable Trust / institution. The Ld. CIT-1, Visakhapatnam observed that allowing the deduction of expenditure relating to the earlier assessment years during the AY 2010-11 amounted to grant of double benefit to the assessee and therefore the order of 10 the Ld. AO is erroneous and also prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The Ld. CIT-1, Visakhapatnam