SRI SAHASRALINGESWARA SWAMY,PONNUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS WARD, GUNTUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO under Section 147 for assessment years prior to the date of registration under Section 12A were invalid in law, relying on the third proviso to Section 12A(2) and Supreme Court precedent. The Tribunal quashed the assessment orders and allowed the assessee's appeal.
What were the facts?
A Religious Trust, registered under Section 12A from AY 2017-18, was reassessed under Section 147/148 for AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17 by the AO, who denied 15% exemption for surplus income due to lack of 12A registration in those years. The CIT(A) granted partial relief by accepting some income as agricultural. The assessee appealed, arguing that reassessment proceedings for prior years based solely on non-registration were invalid as per the third proviso to Section 12A(2) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
The key legal issue was the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 for assessment years preceding the year of Section 12A registration, specifically whether such action is barred by the third proviso to Section 12A(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 12A,Section 12A(2),Section 12AA,Section 11,Section 12
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Prem Chand Markanda SD College for Women v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)5 citing154 Taxmann.com 442 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
आदेश की प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-
1. 1. निर्धाररती/The : Sri Sahasralingeswara Swamy Temple, Ponnur Town and Ponnur Mandal, Guntur Assessee District-522124, Andhra Pradesh 2. रधजस्व/ : The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), The Standard House, Behind SBI Commercial Revenue Branch, Nagarampalem, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam 4. नवभधगीय प्रनतनिनर्, आयकर अपीलीय अनर्करण / DR,ITAT, Visakhapatnam.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026