BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

41 results for “TDS”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai491Delhi424Bangalore264Kolkata126Hyderabad113Jaipur97Chennai96Patna79Chandigarh58Raipur46Visakhapatnam41Ahmedabad37Indore34Pune34Rajkot26Lucknow22Nagpur18Agra16Cochin16Panaji16Guwahati13Surat12Jodhpur11Allahabad7Ranchi5Amritsar4Varanasi4Dehradun2Jabalpur2Telangana1Karnataka1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 14848Section 133A35Survey u/s 133A35Section 14724Section 148A19TDS15Addition to Income15Section 142(1)14Section 26314Section 36(1)(v)

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1) (TDS), VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LTD., TIRUPATHI

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 452/VIZ/2010[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.452-454/Viz/2010 (निर्धारण वर्ा/A.Ys : 2008-09 To 2010-11 Respectively) Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S Southern Power Circle-3(1) (Tds) Distribution Company Of Vijayawada A.P.Limited Behind Srinivasa Kalyana Mandapam Kesavavayana Gunta Tirupati [Pan : Hydso8188F] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1217/H/2010,517/Viz/2019 &518/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/A.Ys : 2008-09 To 2010-11 Respectively) M/S Southern Power Distribution Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of Company Of A.P.Limited Income Tax Behind Srinivasa Kalyana Mandapam Circle-3(1) (Tds) Kesavavayana Gunta Vijayawada Tirupati [Pan : Hydso8188F] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri C.P.Rama Swami, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 04.09.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04.10.2019

For Appellant: Shri C.P.Rama Swami, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 133ASection 194ISection 201(1)

u/s 133A was conducted in the business premises of the assessee on 29.09.2008. During the course of survey, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee has made the payment of lease rentals to M/s Klenn & Marshall on which TDS

Showing 1–20 of 41 · Page 1 of 3

14
Section 40A(7)(b)14
Deduction14

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 36/VIZ/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

TDS certificates evidencing deduction of tax at source on the interest paid to the lender. Also, the CIT(A) took cognizance of the fact that the assessee company had repaid the subject loan in two tranches of Rs. 50 lac each on 08.11.2017 and 30.11.2017. Further, the fact that a loan that was raised by the assessee’s group entity

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 38/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

TDS certificates evidencing deduction of tax at source on the interest paid to the lender. Also, the CIT(A) took cognizance of the fact that the assessee company had repaid the subject loan in two tranches of Rs. 50 lac each on 08.11.2017 and 30.11.2017. Further, the fact that a loan that was raised by the assessee’s group entity

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 34/VIZ/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

TDS certificates evidencing deduction of tax at source on the interest paid to the lender. Also, the CIT(A) took cognizance of the fact that the assessee company had repaid the subject loan in two tranches of Rs. 50 lac each on 08.11.2017 and 30.11.2017. Further, the fact that a loan that was raised by the assessee’s group entity

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 35/VIZ/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

TDS certificates evidencing deduction of tax at source on the interest paid to the lender. Also, the CIT(A) took cognizance of the fact that the assessee company had repaid the subject loan in two tranches of Rs. 50 lac each on 08.11.2017 and 30.11.2017. Further, the fact that a loan that was raised by the assessee’s group entity

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 37/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: None
Section 131Section 147

TDS certificates evidencing deduction of tax at source on the interest paid to the lender. Also, the CIT(A) took cognizance of the fact that the assessee company had repaid the subject loan in two tranches of Rs. 50 lac each on 08.11.2017 and 30.11.2017. Further, the fact that a loan that was raised by the assessee’s group entity

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 515/VIZ/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

133A of the Act was conducted in this case on 18.3.2010 and during the course of survey, the A.O. found that premium payments to LIC towards group gratuity for its employees was claimed as deduction. Since the group gratuity fund of the trust was not an approved fund or trust as required under section

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 524/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

133A of the Act was conducted in this case on 18.3.2010 and during the course of survey, the A.O. found that premium payments to LIC towards group gratuity for its employees was claimed as deduction. Since the group gratuity fund of the trust was not an approved fund or trust as required under section

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 49/VIZ/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

133A of the Act was conducted in this case on 18.3.2010 and during the course of survey, the A.O. found that premium payments to LIC towards group gratuity for its employees was claimed as deduction. Since the group gratuity fund of the trust was not an approved fund or trust as required under section

THE ACIT,, ELURU vs. M/S. THE DISTRICT CO - OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 269/VIZ/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

133A of the Act was conducted in this case on 18.3.2010 and during the course of survey, the A.O. found that premium payments to LIC towards group gratuity for its employees was claimed as deduction. Since the group gratuity fund of the trust was not an approved fund or trust as required under section

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 50/VIZ/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

133A of the Act was conducted in this case on 18.3.2010 and during the course of survey, the A.O. found that premium payments to LIC towards group gratuity for its employees was claimed as deduction. Since the group gratuity fund of the trust was not an approved fund or trust as required under section

THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU vs. M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 78/VIZ/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

133A of the Act was conducted in this case on 18.3.2010 and during the course of survey, the A.O. found that premium payments to LIC towards group gratuity for its employees was claimed as deduction. Since the group gratuity fund of the trust was not an approved fund or trust as required under section

THE ACIT., CIRCLE - 1, ELURU, ELURU vs. M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 476/VIZ/2012[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

133A of the Act was conducted in this case on 18.3.2010 and during the course of survey, the A.O. found that premium payments to LIC towards group gratuity for its employees was claimed as deduction. Since the group gratuity fund of the trust was not an approved fund or trust as required under section

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 507/VIZ/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS in respect of payments made for machine hire charges, therefore, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) attracts and the AO did not consider this issue and failed to make the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of tax at source. Accordingly the Ld.CIT held that the assessments made u/s 143(3) dated 24.12.2009 for the assessment year

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 508/VIZ/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS in respect of payments made for machine hire charges, therefore, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) attracts and the AO did not consider this issue and failed to make the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of tax at source. Accordingly the Ld.CIT held that the assessments made u/s 143(3) dated 24.12.2009 for the assessment year

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 505/VIZ/2016[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS in respect of payments made for machine hire charges, therefore, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) attracts and the AO did not consider this issue and failed to make the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of tax at source. Accordingly the Ld.CIT held that the assessments made u/s 143(3) dated 24.12.2009 for the assessment year

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 506/VIZ/2016[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS in respect of payments made for machine hire charges, therefore, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) attracts and the AO did not consider this issue and failed to make the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of tax at source. Accordingly the Ld.CIT held that the assessments made u/s 143(3) dated 24.12.2009 for the assessment year

THE ITO (TDS), RAJAHMUNDRY vs. M/S. OM SAI RAM, ENTERPRISES,, MANDAPETA

In the result, appeal of the revenue and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 152/VIZ/2016[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Mar 2019AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.152/Viz/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2014-15) Income Tax Officer (Tds) Vs. M/S Om Sai Ram Enterprises Tds Ward-1 Ravulapalem Rajahmundry [Pan : Aaao2649G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.70/Viz/2018 Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.152/Viz/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/S Om Sai Ram Enterprises Vs. Income Tax Officer (Tds) Ravulapalem Tds Ward-1 Rajahmundry [Pan : Aaao2649G] रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 31.01.2019 20.03.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194C(1)Section 201(1)Section 271C

u/s 133A was conducted in the business premises of the assessee by TDS Unit of Income Tax Department, Rajahmundry on 29.01.2014 to verify the deduction of TDS and remittance to Govt. of India account. Subsequent to the survey

THE ITO(TDS) WARD-3(3), GUNTUR vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WATER SUPPLY PROJECT,,

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 511/VIZ/2013[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A.No.511/Viz/2013 & 512/Viz/2013 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 & 2012-13) Income Tax Officer (Tds) Vs. Executive Engineer Ward-3(3) Rural Water Supply Project Guntur Viswanadhapuram Podili, Prakasam Dist. [Pan : Hydro2981G] (अपीऱार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2013 (Arising Out Of Ita No.511 & 512/Viz/2013) (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 & 2012-13) Executive Engineer Vs. Income Tax Officer (Tds) Rural Water Supply Project Ward-3(3) Viswanadhapuram Guntur Podili, Prakasam Dist. [Pan : Hydro2981G] (अपीऱार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri MN Murthy Naik, CIT, DR
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

survey was conducted u/s 133A on 28.03.2012 in the office premises of Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply Project, Viswanadhapuram, Podili, Prakasam District to verify the compliance to TDS

SRI SRUJANA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 157/VIZ/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Sept 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri C.R.Hemanth Kumar, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR
Section 133ASection 37(1)Section 40A

133A of the Act. Otherwise, the assessee should have either explained the same to the AO during the course of pending assessment proceedings, or suo motu rectified the mistake in the effective date of rental agreement, if any, before the date of undertaking the survey action by the Department. Further, the assessee has not adduced any other evidence of whatsoever