SUBBA RAO JALADI,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

TDS Return - Payment to Contractor (Section 194C) Valued at Rs. 5,03,950/- 3. Assessing Officer observed that as per the information available in this office, the assessee has made huge cash deposits to the tune of Rs. 9,52,90,900/- during the year under consideration. As the assessee has not filed his return of income for the year

SREE ANANTALAKSHMI TEXTILES PVT LTD,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, ELURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.402/Viz/2025 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2020-21) Sree Anantalakshmi Textiles (P) Ltd., Vs. Income Tax Officer – Tds Ward-1 C/O. Nsl Textiles Limited Income Tax Office, Kks Towers Engee House, 3Rd Floor, 4Th Line R.R. Pet, Eluru – 534002 Chadramouli Nagar, Guntur – 522007 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aadcs1442E] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate : Dr. Aparna Villuri,Sr.Ar राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By सुिवाई समाप्त होिे की ततति/ Date Of Conclusion Of Hearing : 25.09.2025 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.10.2025

TDS based on the information available in the Tax Audit Report. Assessee could not submit response to the notices. Thereafter, Ld. AO after considering all the details available with him on record concluded that the assessee is “assessee-in-default” within the meaning of section 201(1) of the Act for non deduction of tax at source

KUSHALAVA SPINNERS & GINNERS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GUNTUR

Bench: Us:

TDS Ward ('AO') u/s. 201(1A) of the IT Act dt. 28-10-2021, is not in accordance with the fact and provisions of law. 2. The Learned CIT(A) ought not have dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant, ex-parte, in view of the provisions of section 250

SRI KOTI LINGA HARI HARA MAHAKSHETRAM TEMPLE,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WD, RAJAHMUNDRY

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.365/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16) Sri Koti Linga Hari Hara Vs. Income Tax Officer, Mahakshetram Temple, Exemption Ward, Visakhapatnam. Rajahmundry. Pan: Acgfs3064C (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Sri Cr Hemanth Kumar, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 03/11/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 07/11/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm :

TDS return, the assessee was in receipt of other interests under section 194A of Rs. 3,47,101/-. The AO also observed that the assessee did not file its return of income for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, based on the above information, the AO opined that the income chargeable to tax to the extent

ANGA VIKRANTH VARMA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan Sआ.अपी.सं / Ita No.420 & 421/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2021-22)

TDS credit of Rs.21,86,073/- while making the assessment and determining the tax liability. He, therefore pleaded to direct the learned Assessing Officer to consider the net winnings of the assessee at only Rs.24,90,680/- instead of Rs.72,86,158/- as assessed by the learned Assessing Officer. 4. Per contra, learned DR contended that despite giving sufficient opportunities

ANGA VIKRANTH VARMA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan Sआ.अपी.सं / Ita No.420 & 421/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2021-22)

TDS credit of Rs.21,86,073/- while making the assessment and determining the tax liability. He, therefore pleaded to direct the learned Assessing Officer to consider the net winnings of the assessee at only Rs.24,90,680/- instead of Rs.72,86,158/- as assessed by the learned Assessing Officer. 4. Per contra, learned DR contended that despite giving sufficient opportunities

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble(Hybrid Hearing) आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.507/Viz/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) 3F Industries Limited, Vs. Acit, P.B. No. 15, Tanuku Road, Circle-1, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Rajamahendravaram. District, Andhra Pradesh-534102. Pan: Aaacf 2643 K (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Suvibha Nolkha, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

section 250 of the Act dated 05th December, 2024, the Ld. Addl. / JCIT(A)-2 erred in (1) Failed to allow credit of unclaimed brought forward TDS

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), , GUNTUR vs. NSL TEXTILES LIMITED,, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes and the cross objections filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

section 250(4) of the IT Act and these documents are not produced by the appellant on its own. Hence cannot be treated as additional evidence or new evidence. Ongoing through the material available and the submissions made by the appellant, it is clear that the commission agents rendered service outside India and do not have any permanent establishment

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), , GUNTUR vs. NSL TEXTILES LIMITED, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes and the cross objections filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

section 250(4) of the IT Act and these documents are not produced by the appellant on its own. Hence cannot be treated as additional evidence or new evidence. Ongoing through the material available and the submissions made by the appellant, it is clear that the commission agents rendered service outside India and do not have any permanent establishment

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA vs. ANDHRA PRADESH URBAN FINANCIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee are disposed off accordingly

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.318, 327 & 328/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Acit – Circle – 1(1) V. Andhra Pradesh Urban Financial & Infrastructure Development Central Revenue Buildings Corporation M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520002 54-15-5, Srinivasa Nagar Bank Colony Opp. Venue Convention Centre-520008 Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaifa9311J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

TDS return payment of Rs.63,99,271/- for the F.Y 2014-15. Since assessee has not filed return of income, Ld. AO, Ward 6(1) Hyderabad issued notice under section 148 of the Act on 30.03.2021. Subsequently, a notice under section 142(1) was issued on 08.09.2021. Thereafter on 11.11.2021 the case was transferred to ReAC from Ward

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA vs. ANDHRA PRADESH URBAN FINANCIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee are disposed off accordingly

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.318, 327 & 328/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Acit – Circle – 1(1) V. Andhra Pradesh Urban Financial & Infrastructure Development Central Revenue Buildings Corporation M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520002 54-15-5, Srinivasa Nagar Bank Colony Opp. Venue Convention Centre-520008 Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaifa9311J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

TDS return payment of Rs.63,99,271/- for the F.Y 2014-15. Since assessee has not filed return of income, Ld. AO, Ward 6(1) Hyderabad issued notice under section 148 of the Act on 30.03.2021. Subsequently, a notice under section 142(1) was issued on 08.09.2021. Thereafter on 11.11.2021 the case was transferred to ReAC from Ward

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. ANDHRA PRADESH URBAN FINANCIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee are disposed off accordingly

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.318, 327 & 328/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Acit – Circle – 1(1) V. Andhra Pradesh Urban Financial & Infrastructure Development Central Revenue Buildings Corporation M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520002 54-15-5, Srinivasa Nagar Bank Colony Opp. Venue Convention Centre-520008 Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaifa9311J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

TDS return payment of Rs.63,99,271/- for the F.Y 2014-15. Since assessee has not filed return of income, Ld. AO, Ward 6(1) Hyderabad issued notice under section 148 of the Act on 30.03.2021. Subsequently, a notice under section 142(1) was issued on 08.09.2021. Thereafter on 11.11.2021 the case was transferred to ReAC from Ward

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. FYSOLATE TECHNOLOGIES, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.182/Viz/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Fysolate Technologies, Income Tax, Vijayawada. Vijawayada. Pan: Aacff5633L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mithilesh Sannareddy ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 16/04/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of : 15/07/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

section 250(4) of the Act the Ld. CIT(A) has co-terminus Powers with that of the Ld. AO and hence the Ld. CIT(A) need not call for a remand report unless otherwise there is any further examination required by the Ld. AO. On this ground, the Ld. AR relied on the following case laws: 1. Judgment

GLAXO SMITH KLINE CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LIMITED,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (TDS), RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

TDS matters of Rajahmundry factory were being (M/s. Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd.) handled by one Mr. P Sriram Murthy who worked in the capacity of Deputy Manager, Finance. He was authorized to sign and submit documents with the tax departments, file periodic tax returns and represent the company before the concerned tax authorities. Mr. P Sriram Murthy was later

GLAXO SMITH KLINE CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LIMITED,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (TDS), RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

TDS matters of Rajahmundry factory were being (M/s. Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd.) handled by one Mr. P Sriram Murthy who worked in the capacity of Deputy Manager, Finance. He was authorized to sign and submit documents with the tax departments, file periodic tax returns and represent the company before the concerned tax authorities. Mr. P Sriram Murthy was later

INDIRA VOONA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 244/Viz/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Indira Voona V. Income Tax Officer – Ward 3(1) Visakhapatnam Plot No. 24, Sector 12 Mvp Colony, Visakhapatnam – 530017 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aewpv1518E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 268/Viz/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2015-16) Income Tax Officer – Tds Ward -1 Indira Voona V. Visakhapatnam Plot No. 24, Sector 12 Mvp Colony, Visakhapatnam – 530017 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aewpv1518E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

TDS under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act. 14. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). Similar submissions were made before Ld. CIT(A) by the assessee as was made before Assessing Officer. Ld. CIT(A) by relying on various judicial pronouncements dismissed the appeal

INDIRA VOONA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD 1, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 244/Viz/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Indira Voona V. Income Tax Officer – Ward 3(1) Visakhapatnam Plot No. 24, Sector 12 Mvp Colony, Visakhapatnam – 530017 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aewpv1518E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 268/Viz/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2015-16) Income Tax Officer – Tds Ward -1 Indira Voona V. Visakhapatnam Plot No. 24, Sector 12 Mvp Colony, Visakhapatnam – 530017 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aewpv1518E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

TDS under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act. 14. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). Similar submissions were made before Ld. CIT(A) by the assessee as was made before Assessing Officer. Ld. CIT(A) by relying on various judicial pronouncements dismissed the appeal

M/S THE BHEEMUNIPATNAM MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD-6(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अऩीऱ सं./ I.T.A. No.92/Viz/2015 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year :2013-14) M/S. The Bheemunipatnam Vs. Income Tax Officer (Tds), Mutually Aided Cooperative Ward-6(1), Building Society Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaaat 5114 H (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Y.A. Rao प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Sri Karthik Manickam, Sr. Ar सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 13/04/2022 घोषणध की तधरीख/Date Of : 11/05/2022 Pronouncement O R D E R Per S. Balakrishnan:

TDS), Mutually Aided Cooperative Ward-6(1), Building Society Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam. PAN: AAAAT 5114 H (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant by : Sri Y.A. Rao प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent by : Sri Karthik Manickam, Sr. AR सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date of Hearing : 13/04/2022 घोषणध की तधरीख/Date of : 11/05/2022 Pronouncement