BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,426Delhi1,426Kolkata401Ahmedabad369Jaipur364Chennai281Bangalore196Surat189Chandigarh182Hyderabad138Indore127Raipur125Rajkot122Pune110Amritsar81Nagpur67Guwahati66Visakhapatnam65Lucknow62Cochin61Jodhpur42Agra41Patna34Allahabad33Cuttack25Ranchi22Dehradun18Jabalpur12Varanasi7Panaji3

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12Survey u/s 133A6Section 2635Capital Gains5Long Term Capital Gains5Penny Stock5Revision u/s 2635Section 69A2Addition to Income

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. SHRI GANESH PRASAD,, VARANASI

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 138/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income - Mr. Ganesh Prasad, Tax, V. S-6/108, Golghar Katchhari, Circle-1, Aayakarbhawan, Varanasi-221002, U.P. Maqboolalam Road Varanasi-221002, U.P.

For Appellant: Shri Subash Chand Adv. & Sh. Ashutosh BhardwajFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A

2,02,50,000 by backdated bogus cash sales entries. 9. Though the assessee had credited it as sales which through bogus sales, was offered to taxation. The assessee by doing so has escaped higher taxation and penalty as per section 69Aof the Act and penalty thereof. The assessee has further enjoyed the advantage of debiting the purchases

2

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2014-2015
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. M/S RATANDEEP GOLD & DIAMOND PVT. LTD., CHANDAULI

ITA 136/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi03 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner M/S Ratandeep Gold & Diamond Of Income Tax, V. Pvt. Ltd. Circle-1, M A Road, 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P. Pan:Aahcr4764Q (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 02/Vns/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 136/Vns/2020) Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S Ratandeep Gold & The Deputy Commissioner Of Diamond Pvt. Ltd. V. Income Tax,Circle-1, M.A. Road 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P.

For Appellant: Shri Shishir Bajpai, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 69A

bogus unregistered purchases to inflate expenses and to suppress profits, and for which additions were estimated by the AO @10% of unregistered purchases in the absence of verification by the AO as no details were furnished by the assessee , but ld. CIT(A) completely misdirected himself by only seeing the average price of unregistered purchases vis-à-vis price