Search: bogus purchases

7 results for “bogus purchases”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12 Survey u/s 133A6 Section 2635 Capital Gains5 Long Term Capital Gains5 Penny Stock5 Revision u/s 2635 Section 69A2 Addition to Income

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. SHRI GANESH PRASAD,, VARANASI

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 138/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income - Mr. Ganesh Prasad, Tax, V. S-6/108, Golghar Katchhari, Circle-1, Aayakarbhawan, Varanasi-221002, U.P. Maqboolalam Road Varanasi-221002, U.P.

For Appellant: Shri Subash Chand Adv. & Sh. Ashutosh BhardwajFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A

deduction for purchases and other expenses are made. It was submitted that these are normal business receipts which have suffered taxation and no case is made out for making additions u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE of the 1961 Act. The ld. Counsel for the assessee relied upon the appellate order passed by ld. CIT(A) and submitted that there

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. SHRI GANESH PRASAD,, VARANASI

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. SHRI GANESH PRASAD,, VARANASI

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. M/S RATANDEEP GOLD & DIAMOND PVT. LTD., CHANDAULI

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI