BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,090Delhi786Chennai603Pune370Bangalore306Kolkata202Indore177Ahmedabad164Hyderabad153Jaipur96Chandigarh81Visakhapatnam80Cochin73Raipur67Surat59Rajkot54Nagpur46Lucknow41Patna31Guwahati27Agra26Karnataka20Amritsar14Panaji13Cuttack10Dehradun8Ranchi7Jabalpur6SC5Allahabad5Varanasi3Jodhpur3Calcutta2Telangana2Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 14811Section 692Section 144r2Section 1442Section 143(2)2Section 1472

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

TDS of Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 Mousami Choudhury, District Varanasi v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Varanasi Rs. 24,02,503/-, for ay: 2009-10. It was also submitted that the assessee e- filed income tax return in ITR-4, which is a return of income for declaring business income. The ld. Sr. DR submitted

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

TDS of Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 Mousami Choudhury, District Varanasi v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Varanasi Rs. 24,02,503/-, for ay: 2009-10. It was also submitted that the assessee e- filed income tax return in ITR-4, which is a return of income for declaring business income. The ld. Sr. DR submitted

ASHOK KUMAR SINGH,GHAZIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), GHAZIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 30/VNS/2023[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi09 Nov 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 148Section 69

assessment year 2011-12. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in confirming the addition of Rs.32,00,505/- made by the AO as unexplained deposits u/s 69 of the Act. The assessee is also aggrieved in not giving TDS credit of Rs.94,211/-, being the income tax deducted from his Salary income. 2. The facts