No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Circuit Bench, Varanasi.
Before: Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Shri Amit Shukla (JM)
Per B.R.Baskaran (AM) :-
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 02-02- 2023 passed by Ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in confirming the addition of Rs.32,00,505/- made by the AO as unexplained deposits u/s 69 of the Act. The assessee is also aggrieved in not giving TDS credit of Rs.94,211/-, being the income tax deducted from his Salary income.
The facts relating to the case are stated in brief. The assessee is working as Principal of Sahdeo Sanskrit Maha Vidyalay, Maharaj Ganj, Ghazipur. The AO received information that the assessee has deposited a sum of Rs.24,05,100/- in cash in the savings bank account maintained with ICICI Bank and also paid a sum of Rs.75,000/- as insurance premium. Hence the AO reopened the assessment of the year under consideration by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act. The AO issued notices to the assessee, but there was no proper compliance from assessee’s side. The AO also noticed
2 Ashok Kumar Singh
that the assessee has got two more bank accounts maintained with Kashi Gomti Samyut Gramin Bank (KGSGB) and the aggregate deposits made in the said two bank accounts were found to be Rs.3,96,364/- (A/c No.313274010200479) and Rs.3,24,041/- (A/c No.313272010999177). The AO assessed all the above cited four deposits, viz., Rs.24,05,100/- + Rs.75,000/- + Rs.3,96,364/- + Rs.3,24,041/- aggregating to Rs.32,00,505/- as unexplained income of the assessee u/s 69 of the Act.
In the appellate proceedings before Ld CIT(A), the assessee made detailed submissions. (The assessee has also filed written submissions before us.) With regard to the sources of deposits, the main submissions can be summarized as under:-
(a) His salary income in FY 2010-11 relating to AY 2011-12 was Rs.7,87,337/- and the same was deposited in the bank accounts maintained with KGSGB and further, there were transfer of funds from one bank account to another bank account.
(b) The Sahdev Sanskrit Mahavidyalay has deducted TDS of Rs.94,211/- from salary given to the assessee. However, while remitting the TDS amount, the assessment year was wrongly mentioned as AY 2010-11 instead of AY 2011-12. Hence TDS credit should be given to the assessee.
(c) The assessee had also opened another bank account in the name of Principal, Sahdev Mahavidyalaya Gazhipur with KGSGB (A/c No.317271010100304). The various Grants received from UGC for the above said college was deposited into this bank account.
(d) The assessee has withdrawn ‘grants in aid’ amounts from the account maintained in the name of “Principal, Sahdev Mahavidyalaya Gazhipur” for using them for respective purposes and major portion of withdrawals were deposited into his personal bank account and disbursements were made from it, viz.,
(i) A sum of Rs.17.00 lakhs was withdrawn from the account of “Principal, Sahdev Mahavidyalaya Gazhipur” on 12.01.2011 (which was related to “Hostel Building” grant) and it was deposited on various dates in his SB account maintained with ICICI Bank as detailed below:-
3 Ashok Kumar Singh
28.12.2010 - 10,000 20-01-2011 - 1,40,000 20-01-2011 - 5,00,000 26.03.2011 - 1,00,000 31.03.2011 - 9,50,000 ------------- 17,00,000 ========= (ii) A sum of Rs.3.00 lakhs relating to Examination fees was deposited into his ICICI Bank account on 29-11-2010 (Rs.1,00,000/-) and on 31-01-2011 (Rs.2,00,000/-).
(iii) Donation amount of Rs.4,90,100/- received on different dates have been deposited into his ICICI Bank account from 22.4.2010 to 10.3.2011.
Accordingly, it was submitted that the sources of deposit of Rs.24,05,100/- made into ICIC Bank are explained. (It is pertinent to note that the assessee had mentioned Rs.15,50,000/- as Hostel funds and Rs.5,57,000/- as Examination fees as the amounts deposited into his SB account before Ld CIT(A).)
(e) The assessee has used earlier withdrawals from one bank account for making deposits in another account, viz., SB a/c No.313274010999177. The assessee has given details to the tune of Rs.2,86,640/-. We notice that the AO has accepted this fact in his remand report and accordingly observed that the assessee may be given credit of above said amount. However, we notice that the Ld CIT(A) has ignored this view of the AO.
(f) The LIC amount of Rs.75,000/- was paid out of salary savings. Hence no separate addition is required.
The Ld CIT(A) called for a remand report from the AO and the report given by the AO may summarized as under:- 1 (a) With regard to TDS deducted from Salary account of the assessee, the AO observed that the Form 26AS relating to AY 2010-11 and 2011- 12 do not reflect the TDS amount of Rs.94,211/- as claimed by the assessee. Hence the AO observed that the TDS claim should be rejected.
4 Ashok Kumar Singh
(b) As noticed earlier, the AO agreed that the assessee should be given credit of Rs.2,86,640/- for the amounts transferred from one bank account to another bank account.
(c) With regard to the transfer of Grant funds from College bank account to assessee’s bank account for onward utilization of the same, the AO rejected the said claim for want of evidences and for not citing relevant Rules and Regulations.
The Ld CIT(A) confirmed all the additions and did not even give relief of Rs.2,86,640/- also. Aggrieved, the assessee has filed this appeal before the Tribunal.
We heard the parties and perused the record. Under the provisions of Income tax, all receipts are not taxable, i.e., only those receipts which constitute income of the assessee can be brought to tax. One exception to this rule is the deeming fictions incorporated in the Income tax Act, which make certain receipts taxable, even though they may not constitute income in the hands of the assessee. For example, unexplained cash credits are brought to tax u/s 68 of the Act. Similarly, unexplained bank deposits/investments can also be brought to tax u/s 69 etc. However, if the assessee offers explanation to the satisfaction of the AO with regard to cash credits and investments, then the AO should not bring those amounts to tax. There should not be any doubt that the satisfaction that should be arrived at by the AO should be objective satisfaction.
The aggregate amount of deposits assessed in the hands of the assessee is Rs.32,00,505/-. The AO has accepted for granting relief to the extent of Rs.2,86,640/- in the remand report, being the amounts transferred from one bank account to another bank account. We noticed that the Ld CIT(A) did not grant relief for this amount and in our view, the same is not justified. Accordingly, we direct the AO to grant relief of above said amount of Rs.2,86,640/-.
5 Ashok Kumar Singh
With regard to the transfer of funds (Grants in aid received from UGC) from College account to the assessee’s account, the explanation of the Ld A.R was that the college was constrained to transfer the same to the assessee’s bank account in order to comply with the rules of UGC relating to requirement of utilizing them within a prescribed period. It was submitted that the amounts so transferred have been used for college purposes only. We notice that the AO has expressed the view that the assessee did not furnish Rules and Regulations, which permit such kinds of transfers and use of funds. In our view, if the college admits that the grants in aid amounts have been transferred to assessee’s account on behalf of the college and later it was utilized for college purposes, then amounts so transferred cannot be brought to tax in the hands of the assessee, because:- (a) the owner of funds, viz., College itself would be admitting that its funds have been transferred to the assessee’s account on its behalf, in which case, the sources of funds would stand explained.
(b) the assessee shall become “trustee” for the amounts so transferred, i.e., he shall be holding the amount in trust on behalf of the college and hence it will not constitute income in the hands of the assessee.
With regard to transfer of Examination fees and donation amounts to the account of the assessee, above said principles would equally apply.
Accordingly, we are of the view that both the above said claim of the assessee with regard to transfer of grants in aid amounts, examination fees, donations requires fresh examination at the end of AO in accordance with the principles discussed above. Accordingly, we set aside the order passed by Ld CIT(A) on these issues and restore them to the file of AO for examining the same in accordance with the above said principles. We also direct the assessee to furnish all evidences including confirmations obtained from the College and such other information and explanations that may be called for by the AO. After examining them objectively, the AO may decide the issue afresh.
6 Ashok Kumar Singh
With regard to the claim of TDS credit of Rs.94,211/-, we direct the assessee to get necessary TDS certificate from the college and furnish the same to the AO for allowing credit.
With regard to the insurance premium payment of Rs.75,000/-, it is the claim of the assessee that the same has been paid out of his salary savings and in our view, considering the smallness of amounts, the same can be accepted. Accordingly, we direct the AO to delete this addition.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 9.11.2023.
Sd/- Sd/- (Amit Shukla) (B.R. Baskaran) Judicial Member Accountant Member Varanasi.; Dated : 09/11/2023 Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, Varanasi. 6. Guard File. BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Assistant Registrar) PS ITAT, Varanasi