BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 10Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi853Mumbai717Bangalore594Kolkata180Pune156Chennai134Ahmedabad124Hyderabad118Karnataka73Jaipur33Lucknow20Cuttack15Cochin15Visakhapatnam13Indore11Surat9Amritsar8Telangana8Guwahati6Ranchi6Calcutta5Chandigarh5Agra4Nagpur4Varanasi4Panaji2Orissa2Jodhpur2Rajkot2Raipur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 10(20)10Section 2607Section 12A6Section 10A6Section 260A4Section 10(29)4Comparables/TP4Section 92C3Section 4(1)2

M.Y.Maharshi vs. The Asst. Commissioner of Income-Tax

In the result, we do not find

ITTA/282/2013HC Telangana16 Jul 2013
Section 10ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 260Section 92C

transfer pricing issues have to be determined on the basis of financial sun transactions of the previous financial year relevant to the assessment year involved as mandated under Rule 10B of the Rules. Alternatively, it is submitted that the order passed by the Tribunal has been passed without any reasons and suffers from the vice of non-application of mind

Vodafone Idea Limited vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned

Exemption2
Transfer Pricing2
Deduction2
ITTA/181/2022
HC Telangana
08 Jan 2024

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,N.TUKARAMJI

Section 260

Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) questioning the correctness and legality of order dated 11.3.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru (for short, ‘Appellate Authority’) in ITA.No.536/Bang/2017 for the assessment year 2010-11, raising the following substantial questions of law: “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances

Commissioner of Income Tax, Guntur. vs. Agricultural Market Committee, Kangiri.

ITTA/318/2008HC Telangana01 Mar 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

For Respondent: Ms. K.Lalitha, Standing Counsel for
Section 10(20)Section 10(29)Section 12ASection 260ASection 4Section 4(1)

10B, 10BA, 10BB and 10C are the other group of provisions which are special provisions in respect of newly established undertakings either in free trade zones, Special Economic Zones, 100 per cent export oriented undertakings and industrial undertakings in the North Eastern Region. These permit deduction of whole or part of the profits for certain period while computing the total

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Agricultural Market Committee,

ITTA/251/2008HC Telangana01 Mar 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

For Respondent: Ms. K.Lalitha, Standing Counsel for
Section 10(20)Section 10(29)Section 12ASection 260ASection 4Section 4(1)

10B, 10BA, 10BB and 10C are the other group of provisions which are special provisions in respect of newly established undertakings either in free trade zones, Special Economic Zones, 100 per cent export oriented undertakings and industrial undertakings in the North Eastern Region. These permit deduction of whole or part of the profits for certain period while computing the total

Commissioner of Income Tax-3, vs. M/s State Bank of Hyderabad

ITTA/77/2016HC Telangana20 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 10ASection 260Section 260A

10B are concerned, besides the nature of unit being different Free Trade Zone Unit (S.10A) and 100% EOU Unit (S.10B), the substance of these Date of Judgment 23-07-2018 I.T.A.No.77 /2016 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr., Vs. M/s. GE Medical Systems India Pvt. Ltd., 9/19 provisions is the same, the difference is only in the categories of assessee

J Anjaneya Sharma vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-V

ITTA/508/2013HC Telangana25 Oct 2013
Section 260Section 92A

10B[1][e] of the Rules?” Date of Judgment 12-07-2018, ITA Nos.508/2013 & 329/2014 M/s. Business Process Outsourcing India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Income Tax Officer. 4/10 4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant-Assessee does not press substantial question No.4. 5. Submission is taken on record. 6. The learned Tribunal, after discussing the rival contentions of both the Appellants-Assessee

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s Mohan Milk Line Private Limited,

ITTA/396/2015HC Telangana06 Apr 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 260Section 260A

10B of the Income Tax Rules and also when the sale of the turnover and profit margins are not linked in the software industry unlike capital intensive companies?” (2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that Tata Elxsi Limited cannot be taken as comparables on the basis

The commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. M/s Lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd

ITTA/121/2013HC Telangana26 Jul 2013

10b Mahendrakumar Mafatlal Shah, both of Mumbai Indian Inhabitants, having present address at A/1003 Gokul Vrindavan, Shantilal Modi X Road No.2, Kandivali (West), Mumbai 400 067. 11a Atul Shakaralal Shah 11b Alpa Atul Shah, both adults, of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitants, having present address at B/104 Shanti Apartment No.1, Mathuradas Ext Road, Kandivali (West), Mumbai 400 067. 12a Hemant Zaverilal Shah