BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 270clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai359Delhi281Chennai109Bangalore96Hyderabad75Ahmedabad74Jaipur45Chandigarh41Cochin40Visakhapatnam35Cuttack23Kolkata20Guwahati18Indore15Patna14Rajkot12Pune12Dehradun11Agra7Raipur6Allahabad6Lucknow5Karnataka5Surat4Telangana4Nagpur4SC3Amritsar2Orissa1Jodhpur1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1475Section 1534Section 260A3Section 201(1)3Deduction3Section 2602Section 372Reassessment2

M/s Kausalya Agro Farms and Developers pvt. ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are allowed

ITTA/256/2022HC Telangana02 Feb 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 147Section 153Section 260ASection 37

270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 279, 281, 283, 284 and 294 of 2022 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) This order will dispose of the above batch of income tax appeals. 2. Heard Mr. Dwarakanath, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttam Reddy, learned counsel for the assessees/appellants and Ms. K.Mamata Choudary, learned

M/s. Dakshin Infrastructures Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are allowed

ITTA/275/2022
HC Telangana
02 Feb 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 147Section 153Section 260ASection 37

270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 279, 281, 283, 284 and 294 of 2022 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) This order will dispose of the above batch of income tax appeals. 2. Heard Mr. Dwarakanath, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttam Reddy, learned counsel for the assessees/appellants and Ms. K.Mamata Choudary, learned

Commissioner of Income Tax, Guntur vs. Agricultural Market Committee, Krosur

ITTA/166/2011HC Telangana21 Apr 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 231Section 260Section 260A

270 litres of water per day from Cauvery River. In order to get the benefit of consultancy services of International Standards, the assessee floated global tenders and contract for Stage – I project was awarded to a Consortium, consisting of two companies and an agreement was executed on 29.11.1996 as per which maximum charges payable for consultancy services were Rs.19

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. M/S Sri Krishna Drugs Ltd.,

ITTA/166/2006HC Telangana16 Nov 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 147Section 147(1)

270 ITR 534 as well as the judgment reported as B.M. Gupta & sons (HUF) vs ACIT (2008) 299 ITR 410 (Del). ITAs 166, 168, 243, 778/2006 Page 5 7. Counsel for the assessee, Mr. Sethi, argued that the appeal is bereft of merit, and the ITAT's order does not call for interference. It was argued that having regard