BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi356Mumbai352Bangalore106Chennai95Jaipur48Kolkata48Hyderabad47Karnataka39Ahmedabad28Lucknow22Chandigarh21Panaji11SC10Surat9Pune9Nagpur9Cochin9Rajkot6Jodhpur6Cuttack4Raipur4Visakhapatnam3Amritsar3Patna3Telangana3Rajasthan2Ranchi2Agra2Orissa2Punjab & Haryana1Indore1Guwahati1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 10A5Section 2603Section 143(3)2Reopening of Assessment2

COMMR OF INCOME TAX [TDS], HYDERABAD vs. M/S JAYADARSHINI HOUSING PVT LTD., HYDERABAD

Appeals are hereby dismissed by

ITTA/65/2014HC Telangana26 Mar 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 10Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 260

260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.267/BANG/2012, DATED 30.09.2013, CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(4), BANGALORE. THESE

EVEREST ORGANICS LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF I.T., HYDERABAD

ITTA/9/2005
HC Telangana
21 Sept 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 143(1)(a)

reassessment was upheld. g) Against the order passed by the ITAT dated 31-8-2004 the Revenue has preferred the present appeals under Section 260

M/S.MALLIKARJUNA RICE INDUSTRIES vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITTA/128/2006HC Telangana15 Feb 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 143(3)Section 14gSection 260

260,4. oi rhe Incon.re Tar. Acc, 196L he' Act' lrereinafter) against tl:re order 'z.11005 pmsecl bv ttre Incornr: Ta:< Appellate yclerabad Bench 'ii. I Iyclerabad (brief tv 'Tribunal' in I.-[.A.No.Z8.l/t li.r]/2004 ior the assessmenr t9). 3. Thou;h the :rp,peel ;rc'lnritted on 14.()3,.20,16, no \\'as substantial prestion c,i l.ru