BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 201clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi589Mumbai354Bangalore292Chennai204Jaipur103Ahmedabad74Kolkata55Rajkot28Hyderabad27Raipur24Pune20Jodhpur17Chandigarh15Amritsar15Patna12Lucknow11Karnataka11Visakhapatnam10Indore5Guwahati5Surat5Cuttack4Nagpur4Telangana3SC3Cochin3Allahabad2Ranchi1Dehradun1Panaji1Uttarakhand1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 10A5Section 2604Section 201(1)3Deduction3

Commissioner of Income Tax, Guntur vs. Agricultural Market Committee, Krosur

ITTA/166/2011HC Telangana21 Apr 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 231Section 260Section 260A

reassessment are under Sections 147 and 148 of the Act and they are on a completely differing footing and, therefore, do not merit consideration for the purpose of this case. 19. Even though the period of three years would be a reasonable period as prescribed under Section 153 of the Act for completion of proceedings, we have been told that

COMMR OF INCOME TAX [TDS], HYDERABAD vs. M/S JAYADARSHINI HOUSING PVT LTD., HYDERABAD

Appeals are hereby dismissed by

ITTA/65/2014
HC Telangana
26 Mar 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 10Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 260

reassessed. To confer jurisdiction under Section 147(a) two conditions were required to be satisfied firstly the Assessing Officer must have reason to believe that income profits or gains 22 chargeable to income- tax have escaped assessment, and secondly he must also have reason to believe that such escapement has occurred by reason of either (i) omission or failure

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. K.V.Ramakrishna Rao

ITTA/524/2017HC Telangana21 Aug 2017
For Appellant: Sri T Vishwarupa Chary
Section 173

Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders permitting the petitioners to amend the claim amount by substituting Rs.47,81 ,O0O/- and deleting Rs.15,O0,0O01. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri T Vishwarupa Chary Counsel for the Respondent No.l : _ _ _ Counsel