Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Nara Constructions,

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J. (ORAL): These appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) assail the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) dated 20th February, 2017 in the case of National Housing Bank (respondent- assessee bank, for short) for the Assessment Years

Commissioner of Income Tax-2, vs. Agricultural Market Committee,

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,SANJAY KUMAR

JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Narang, Advocate and Mr. Ishan Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant(s) in ITA-407-2011 and ITA-33-2012. Ms. Gauri Neo Rampal, Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. **** Ritu Bahri, J. CM-29916-CII-2011 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Raaj Kumar Jain

nature of the fact discovered to which such information is required to relate. Normally the section is brought into operation when a person in police custody produces from some place of concealment some object, such as a dead body, a weapon or ornaments, said to be connected with the crime of which the informant is accused. Mr. Megaw

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present statutory appeals, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) are directed against the order dated 27.01.2017 (hereafter “impugned order”) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereafter “ITAT”) in ITA No. 67/DEL/2011 for the AY 2001-2002 whereby the ITAT held that the GE Energy Parts Inc. (hereafter