BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “house property”+ Section 153A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,127Mumbai764Bangalore426Jaipur253Chennai245Hyderabad213Chandigarh94Cochin89Amritsar76Visakhapatnam76Indore74Pune66Ahmedabad55Kolkata41Rajkot40Nagpur36Agra32Patna27Guwahati26Karnataka21Raipur20Lucknow19Jodhpur18Surat18Cuttack11Dehradun11Kerala7Telangana6Varanasi4Allahabad3SC2Rajasthan1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 153A5Section 54F5Section 234B3Charitable Trust3Addition to Income3Section 260A2Section 1472Section 143(3)2Section 1322

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI METTAM PENCHALA NAIDU

ITTA/59/2010HC Telangana18 Sept 2018

Bench: This Court That The 1St Assessment Order Of The Ito Was Passed On 28.03.1988, Which Was Challenged Before The Leaned Cit (A) & The Same Was Dismissed On 28.11.1988. Against The Said Order, The Assessee Filed An Appeal Before The Itat, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack, Which Was Dismissed On 19.01.1990. Thereafter, By Order Dated 13.12.1990 Passed In A Misc. Application, The Order Dated 19.01.1990 Was Recalled & The Matter Was Heard Afresh. Again On 10.05.1991, Learned Tribunal Decided The Matter & Allowed The Exemption To The Assessee. The Revenue Filed Writ Petition Before This Court Challenging The Rectification Order Dated 13.12.1990. This Court On 02.12.1991 Allowed The Writ Petition & Quashed The Recalling Order Dated 13.12.1990 As Well As Its Substantive Order Dated

Section 254(2)

1) of section 148 or section 153A relating to the assessment year -10- commencing [on the 1st day of April, [2013]] shall,— [(a) in the case of a person being an individual where the total income includes income chargeable to income-tax, under the head,— (i) “Salaries” or income in the nature of family pension as defined in the Explanation

The Commissioner of Income Tax III,. vs. Sri Sudhir Sanghi

ITTA/58/2010
Section 254(2)2
Capital Gains2
Search & Seizure2
HC Telangana
21 Mar 2016

Bench: This Court That The 1St Assessment Order Of The Ito Was Passed On 28.03.1988, Which Was Challenged Before The Leaned Cit (A) & The Same Was Dismissed On 28.11.1988. Against The Said Order, The Assessee Filed An Appeal Before The Itat, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack, Which Was Dismissed On 19.01.1990. Thereafter, By Order Dated 13.12.1990 Passed In A Misc. Application, The Order Dated 19.01.1990 Was Recalled & The Matter Was Heard Afresh. Again On 10.05.1991, Learned Tribunal Decided The Matter & Allowed The Exemption To The Assessee. The Revenue Filed Writ Petition Before This Court Challenging The Rectification Order Dated 13.12.1990. This Court On 02.12.1991 Allowed The Writ Petition & Quashed The Recalling Order Dated 13.12.1990 As Well As Its Substantive Order Dated

Section 254(2)

1) of section 148 or section 153A relating to the assessment year -10- commencing [on the 1st day of April, [2013]] shall,— [(a) in the case of a person being an individual where the total income includes income chargeable to income-tax, under the head,— (i) “Salaries” or income in the nature of family pension as defined in the Explanation

Sampathirao Apparao vs. Income Tax Officer,

The appeals stand dismissed

ITTA/20/2012HC Telangana19 Jul 2013
Section 132(4)Section 132BSection 140ASection 153ASection 234BSection 260

1. By this common order ITA-20-2012 and ITA-21-2012 are disposed of since issues involved in the captioned appeals and prayer sought are common. With the consent of parties and for the sake of brevity, facts are borrowed from ITA-20-2012. Asgar Ali 2024.08.31 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) vs. M/s.Madhu Enterprises

ITTA/127/2025HC Telangana12 Feb 2025

Bench: The Learned

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 260ASection 54F

153A read with Section 143(3) of the Act restricting the deduction under Section 54F to ₹30 crores, as against ₹90 crores claimed by the Assessee. 7. The Assessee had deposited the consideration in the capital gains account in two tranches – ₹30 crores on 28.07.2011 and ₹60 crores on 29.07.2011. The AO noted that the Assessee had paid a certain

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Sri Anand Prakash Sanghi

ITTA/33/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

For Appellant: M/S.HARBOUR VIEWFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 2(47)(v)Section 260ASection 269USection 53A

153A read with Section 153C of the Act on 5.8.2004. The assessee filed a return on 27.12.2004 declaring 'nil' income, consequent to which notice was issued under Section 143(2) and assessment completed making an addition of Rs.1,87,00,000/- as being concealed income under 'short-term capital gain'. The assessee, which was a partnership firm and later registered

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Jyothi Wines,

ITTA/226/2010HC Telangana30 Nov 2010

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.CORDIAL COMPANY
Section 153ASection 153CSection 292C

1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the document recovered on search can be presumed to be true and correct under Section 292C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act for short)? (2) Has not the Tribunal committed an error insofar as putting the burden of proof on the Department? (3) Whether the first appellate